From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1161229AbWGNRQ1@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1161229AbWGNRQ1 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:16:27 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161282AbWGNRQ0
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:16:26 -0400
Received: from rtr.ca ([64.26.128.89]:1212 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161276AbWGNRQZ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:16:25 -0400
Message-ID: <44B7D168.2080304@rtr.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:16:24 -0400
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
       Sander <sander@humilis.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602140439580.3567@p34>  <44AEB3CA.8080606@pobox.com>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607071520160.2643@p34.internal.lan>  <200607091224.31451.liml@rtr.ca>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091327160.23992@p34.internal.lan>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091612060.3886@p34.internal.lan>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091638220.2696@p34.internal.lan>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091645480.2696@p34.internal.lan>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091704250.2696@p34.internal.lan>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091802460.2696@p34.internal.lan>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607100958540.3591@p34.internal.lan> <1152545639.27368.137.camel@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607101145030.3591@p34.internal.lan> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607110926150.858@p34.internal.lan>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607110926150.858@p34.internal.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
> opcode=0x35 & opcode=0xca

Those are non-DMA WRITE opcodes.  Using PIO for I/O is pretty rare these days,
so I'm betting that this is not a hard disk device -- compactflash?

-ml