From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1422677AbWGNRhy@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1422677AbWGNRhy (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:37:54 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422678AbWGNRhy
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:37:54 -0400
Received: from rtr.ca ([64.26.128.89]:10459 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422677AbWGNRhw (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:37:52 -0400
Message-ID: <44B7D66E.3070804@rtr.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:37:50 -0400
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
       Sander <sander@humilis.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602140439580.3567@p34>  <44AEB3CA.8080606@pobox.com>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607071520160.2643@p34.internal.lan>  <200607091224.31451.liml@rtr.ca>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091327160.23992@p34.internal.lan>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091612060.3886@p34.internal.lan>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091638220.2696@p34.internal.lan>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091645480.2696@p34.internal.lan>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091704250.2696@p34.internal.lan>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091802460.2696@p34.internal.lan>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607100958540.3591@p34.internal.lan> <1152545639.27368.137.camel@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607101145030.3591@p34.internal.lan> <44B7D0F7.6000302@rtr.ca> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607141317300.1687@p34.internal.lan>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607141317300.1687@p34.internal.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Justin Piszcz wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Mark Lord wrote:
>
>> So, the drive is rejecting an LBA48 WRITE operation, which should happen
>> only if the drive does not have LBA48 support.  Now, I know you posted 
>> all
>> of this nice info months ago, but let's see it again now, for the exact
>> drive that is generating that specific message.  We need to see the 
>> output
>> from "hdparm --Istdout /dev/sdX" for that drive.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
> 
> Here it is:
> 
> They are identical disks (the WD 400KD), both show up as 373GB (formatted):


Which *exact* unit generated the WRITE errors you posted about?