From: Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com>
To: Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com>
Cc: balbir@in.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
Chris Sturtivant <csturtiv@sgi.com>, Tony Ernst <tee@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] add basic accounting fields to taskstats
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 14:23:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44D7AF34.10301@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44CFCCE4.7060702@sgi.com>
Jay Lan wrote:
[snip]
>>
>>
>>> + /* Each process gets a minimum of a half tick cpu time */
>>> + if ((stats->ac_utime == 0) && (stats->ac_stime == 0)) {
>>> + stats->ac_stime = USEC_PER_TICK/2;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>
>>
>>
>> This is confusing. Half tick does not make any sense from the
>> scheduler view point (or am I missing something?), so why
>> return half a tick to the user.
>
>
> It must be inherited from old code dated back to Cray UNICOS.
> I do not know if bad thing can happen if both utime and stime
> are less than 1 usec... I guess not. But i agree that
> half a tick does not make sense. To play safe, we can change
> it to 1 usec if both utime and stime are sub microsecond.
> What do you think?
Hi Balbir,
I figured this out. The tsk->stime (and utime as well) are
charged by 1 tick (or cputime) from the timer interrupt handler
through update_process_times->account_{user,system}_time.
The clock resolution is a tick. Any short process less than
1 tick will the counter being 0. It can be from 0 to 0.99999...
tick. A half tick is the average value.
I think it makes more sense to assign a half tick than assign
1 usec to the stime. What do you think? Certainly the code need
better explanation.
Regards,
- jay
[snip]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-07 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-31 19:20 Jay Lan
2006-07-31 20:23 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-31 21:50 ` Jay Lan
2006-08-01 14:24 ` Balbir Singh
2006-08-01 21:51 ` Jay Lan
2006-08-02 15:31 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-08-02 17:17 ` Balbir Singh
2006-08-02 17:37 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-08-02 21:09 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-02 23:47 ` Jay Lan
2006-08-03 3:02 ` Balbir Singh
2006-08-07 21:23 ` Jay Lan [this message]
2006-08-08 5:22 ` Balbir Singh
2006-08-08 16:40 ` Jay Lan
2006-08-08 14:57 Al Boldi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44D7AF34.10301@sgi.com \
--to=jlan@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=csturtiv@sgi.com \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=tee@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome