From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753105AbdEIKzU (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2017 06:55:20 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:51279 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752907AbdEIKzS (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2017 06:55:18 -0400 Subject: Re: S390: Fine-tuning for six function implementations To: Ingo Molnar , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: Vegard Nossum , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_Borntr=c3=a4ger?= , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Paul Gortmaker , Peter Oberparleiter , Peter Zijlstra , Sascha Silbe , Viktor Mihajlovski , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , "David S. Miller" References: <51ba03f7-d1d8-8064-7dee-b5a910ad47de@oracle.com> <20170509103031.onbbgnuptd73j7ya@gmail.com> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <44beba0d-2a1c-9afc-58a7-bba750641cf5@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 12:54:09 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170509103031.onbbgnuptd73j7ya@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uQHh9RpVC0IH8+dgKf6tw7obTXFqsSmDu77RhwNZXr6IjlDQBXh R6h27JGyZFeg4DEK/u8iMk+EDK8hzqa+uLsiYlvfB1wr8Lec2amljhVJyaczmUbAJQuME60 rslCKOieBoTKwPxQJNamlFeq37v4gK8bBpklbsFytMF77oP5XAWUGLJtu28PR7TrmXfI8dG gQChdGMIqRTEKMzjJdGsQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:C1mwlYQcYJ4=:o7ozU2zXMlTbtIVRnMGvRZ i+XR3yB1mYgepkH14MLrxGChVquJ+GzBajj6cBaFl3KYHWwYId4DD31spvNVxTDYeBTBf8Dd4 s/PHkWIIJ2wGRvF1gTh4qxDE540Z1zPMdMf+0147/q2Uisibu0TbOEjPLTlrYJBpzxyiKakxy SiYtdt85KTy7nnTOxgueRr+TrNSZQVkMu5jtDPJjiylTQrZ4yiOewpdnQMs4ODUMAOoEhf1Nu /EDEfXIY8MjOuT7VYMnk3/VKG0WirA4VX5T82XvrymwiGf0XxdypEoiEdQCBvnr9vlDoPnZ94 GOVAx0HUJtJApnOt60Xsd9KGr4zuxPdKsYE45k6ln7gEFL/oQBkAMymu/DPiLMQ/n3sA3kekX nVd+aovRjBFITu09GAidG1C0IKjql2yS0U3mbfYEQDzWlKdvgBdV0NveiiEoLd48rvtxmtndA H1s4nQvJmbzpvKslxO/zL/648Gpb9i2IZWjsq5XK4qIQmIyzciJxszl83O5lDRzsdbWNs1y4A QMrz5Pf1fXskcLH4BWN6nccoRqBVetEe04mAwblsg2R8z43rqrU1JX8H224GXzyS9TA34lUdU SWLkGqZh0urx0fGQlw0VOnXWlcfRN//vdFJ0URjP6EdkZeF9rdtajRgn/FrpScZRfhkn/OCS1 BB6k6jiSHnsVxKnekyr8D+2DZAvT2FrTRpqJ2DRDUwwkdUosJXVxVFMFjmoePivw2l8ekzHch FDZXthO1U5sdHKMmg2sMBtg2EyJoq9f/QICd2V0VROt21WOl1jy/4P9WQRKhPRhhvGYFXVb0o P/hwtMX Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > ... they might also be acceptable if they came from a genuine newbie > who does his first patch, How would you really react if such Linux development beginners would dare to pick any of the shown software change opportunities up? > or if these patches represented genuine interest in the subsystem in question, I am interested in various improvements where their size is varying between small and big as usual. > by being part of a larger work that adds new features or does some meaningful > code transformations. These updates happened also several times. Regards, Markus