From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756047AbYEEEm6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 00:42:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752613AbYEEEmt (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 00:42:49 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.233]:44278 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752489AbYEEEms (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 00:42:48 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XQ+sZAYHBSGQftuqVGfug2Ge64cRFC8j7KJ9FOJLaz1vXDVbb5MrNipnVR3+8O9VXkDZRHYRUwQbm1oTwC+uiCg+KmEqTyMEuxjzRuIwEsNLrFhlFUarhRxkiuiIroLePRgvDaepBtR8AbHOmAJMiCy3EACNVd/defeRFg25qtI= Message-ID: <44c63dc40805042142k2e5bc366mffa9e0a22fbe94c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 13:42:47 +0900 From: "minchan Kim" To: "KOSAKI Motohiro" Subject: Re: [-mm][PATCH 3/5] change function prototype of shrink_zone() Cc: LKML , linux-mm , "Andrew Morton" In-Reply-To: <20080504215718.8F5B.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080504201343.8F52.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080504215718.8F5B.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -static unsigned long shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone, > - struct scan_control *sc) > +static int shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone, > + struct scan_control *sc) > { > unsigned long nr_active; > unsigned long nr_inactive; > @@ -1236,8 +1239,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int pri > } > } > > + sc->nr_reclaimed += nr_reclaimed; > throttle_vm_writeout(sc->gfp_mask); > - return nr_reclaimed; > + return 0; > } I am not sure this is right. I might be wrong if this patch is depended on another patch. As I see, shrink_zone always return 0 in your patch. If it is right, I think that return value is useless. It is better that we change function return type to "void" Also, we have to change functions that call shrink_zone properly. ex) balance_pgdat, __zone_reclaim That functions still use number of shrink_zone's reclaim page -- Thanks, barrios