From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anatol Pomazau <anatol@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] pci: iproc: Add Broadcom iProc PCIe support
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:39:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4502186.8jmIz85sZB@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54FF6EAC.90603@broadcom.com>
On Tuesday 10 March 2015 15:22:36 Ray Jui wrote:
> > Do you anticipate additional front-end bus interfaces? If not, and maybe
> > even if you do, you might squash everything into pcie-iproc.c. Then you
> > only need one file (no .h file needed) and the package is a little
> > simpler. I think it's pretty common to have multiple driver registration
> > methods in the same file (OF, PCI, ACPI, etc.) And I think it's common to
> > have those methods guarded by the generic config symbol (CONFIG_PCI,
> > CONFIG_OF, etc.) rather than defining new ones specific to the driver.
> >
>
> Yes I do expect Hauke (CCed) to add BCMA bus front end support later.
>
> I still think having the front end bus driver separated is cleaner and
> may be less troublesome for Hauke to add BCMA support in the future. But
> if you strongly favor having everything stuffed in one single file, I
> can make that change. Please let me know.
>
I was the one that initially suggested splitting the driver into files
like this, and I still think it's the right strategy with the
BCMA driver coming up.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-10 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-10 0:38 [PATCH v5 0/4] " Ray Jui
2015-03-10 0:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] PCI: Export symbols of PCI functions Ray Jui
2015-03-10 20:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-10 21:02 ` Ray Jui
2015-03-10 0:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] pci: iProc: define iProc PCIe platform bus binding Ray Jui
2015-03-10 0:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] pci: iproc: Add Broadcom iProc PCIe support Ray Jui
2015-03-10 21:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-10 22:22 ` Ray Jui
2015-03-10 22:39 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-03-10 22:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-11 1:11 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-10 0:38 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] ARM: dts: enable PCIe support for Cygnus Ray Jui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4502186.8jmIz85sZB@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=anatol@google.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dtor@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®