From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
john.garry@huawei.com, ming.lei@redhat.com, qiulaibin@huawei.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC v3 0/8] improve tag allocation under heavy load
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 20:09:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <450b5ab6-fb82-06dc-2a11-e0b464901c74@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220415101053.554495-1-yukuai3@huawei.com>
On 4/15/22 03:10, Yu Kuai wrote:
> The single io performance(randwrite):
>
> | bs | 128k | 256k | 512k | 1m | 1280k | 2m | 4m |
> | -------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ----- | ---- | ---- |
> | bw MiB/s | 20.1 | 33.4 | 51.8 | 67.1 | 74.7 | 82.9 | 82.9 |
Although the above data is interesting, it is not sufficient. The above
data comes from a setup with a single hard disk. There are many other
configurations that are relevant (hard disk array, high speed NVMe, QD=1
USB stick, ...) but for which no conclusions can be drawn from the above
data.
Another question is whether the approach of this patch series is the
right approach? I would expect that round-robin wakeup of waiters would
be ideal from a fairness point of view. However, there are patches in
this patch series that guarantee that wakeup of tag waiters won't happen
in a round robin fashion.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-25 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-15 10:10 Yu Kuai
2022-04-15 10:10 ` [PATCH -next RFC v3 1/8] sbitmap: record the number of waiters for each waitqueue Yu Kuai
2022-04-15 10:10 ` [PATCH -next RFC v3 2/8] blk-mq: call 'bt_wait_ptr()' later in blk_mq_get_tag() Yu Kuai
2022-04-15 10:10 ` [PATCH -next RFC v3 3/8] sbitmap: make sure waitqueues are balanced Yu Kuai
2022-04-15 10:10 ` [PATCH -next RFC v3 4/8] blk-mq: don't preempt tag under heavy load Yu Kuai
2022-04-15 10:10 ` [PATCH -next RFC v3 5/8] sbitmap: force tag preemption if free tags are sufficient Yu Kuai
2022-04-15 10:10 ` [PATCH -next RFC v3 6/8] blk-mq: force tag preemption for split bios Yu Kuai
2022-04-15 10:10 ` [PATCH -next RFC v3 7/8] blk-mq: record how many tags are needed for splited bio Yu Kuai
2022-04-15 10:10 ` [PATCH -next RFC v3 8/8] sbitmap: wake up the number of threads based on required tags Yu Kuai
2022-04-24 2:43 ` [PATCH -next RFC v3 0/8] improve tag allocation under heavy load yukuai (C)
2022-04-25 3:24 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-04-25 6:14 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-25 6:23 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-04-25 6:47 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-25 6:50 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-04-25 7:05 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-25 7:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-04-25 7:28 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-25 11:20 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-04-25 13:42 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-25 3:09 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2022-04-25 3:27 ` yukuai (C)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=450b5ab6-fb82-06dc-2a11-e0b464901c74@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=qiulaibin@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®