mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Parth Shah <parth@linux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com, qais.yousef@arm.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
	dhaval.giani@oracle.com, qperret@qperret.net,
	David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	pjt@google.com, tj@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Introduce per-task latency_tolerance for scheduler hints
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 10:24:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <450fc7e2-49d5-d809-281f-7d9a99d3e530@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125094618.30298-1-parth@linux.ibm.com>

On 25/11/2019 10:46, Parth Shah wrote:
> This patch series is based on the discussion started as the "Usecases for
> the per-task latency-nice attribute"[1]
> 
> This patch series introduces a new per-task attribute latency_tolerance to
> provide the scheduler hints about the latency requirements of the task.

I forgot but is there a chance to have this as a per-taskgroup attribute
as well?

> Latency_tolerance is a ranged attribute of a task with the value ranging
> from [-20, 19] both inclusive which makes it align with the task nice
> value.
> 
> The value should provide scheduler hints about the relative latency
> requirements of tasks, meaning the task with "latency_tolerance = -20"
> should have lower latency than compared to those tasks with higher values.
> Similarly a task with "latency_tolerance = 19" can have higher latency and
> hence such tasks may bot care much about the latency numbers.
> 
> The default value is set to 0. The usecases defined in [1] can use this
> range of [-20, 19] for latency_tolerance for the specific purpose. This
> patch does not define any use cases for such attribute so that any change
> in naming or range does not affect much to the other (future) patches using
> this. The actual use of latency_tolerance during task wakeup and
> load-balancing is yet to be coded for each of those usecases.

This can definitely be useful for Android/EAS by replacing the current
proprietary solution in android-google-common android-5.4:

commit 760b82c9b88d ("ANDROID: sched/fair: Bias EAS placement for latency")
commit c28f9d3945f1 ("ANDROID: sched/core: Add a latency-sensitive flag
to uclamp")

which links to usercase 6 (EAS) in [1].

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-05  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-25  9:46 Parth Shah
2019-11-25  9:46 ` [RFC 1/3] Introduce latency-tolerance as an per-task attribute Parth Shah
2019-12-03  8:36   ` Qais Yousef
2019-12-03 15:47     ` Parth Shah
2019-12-05  9:24       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-12-05 11:42         ` Parth Shah
2019-11-25  9:46 ` [RFC 2/3] Propagate parent task's latency requirements to the child task Parth Shah
2019-11-25  9:46 ` [RFC 3/3] Allow sched_{get,set}attr to change latency_tolerance of the task Parth Shah
2019-12-03  8:39   ` Qais Yousef
2019-12-03 15:51     ` Parth Shah
2019-12-05  9:24       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-12-06 16:04         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-12-08  5:52           ` Parth Shah
2019-12-05  9:24 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2019-12-05 10:49   ` [RFC 0/3] Introduce per-task latency_tolerance for scheduler hints Valentin Schneider
2019-12-05 14:03     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-12-05 17:13       ` Parth Shah
2019-12-06 12:31         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-12-08  5:57           ` Parth Shah

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=450fc7e2-49d5-d809-281f-7d9a99d3e530@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=dhaval.giani@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=parth@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=qperret@qperret.net \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome