From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
"'Borislav Petkov'" <bp@alien8.de>,
"'Wei WANG'" <wei_wang@realsil.com.cn>,
"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Samuel Ortiz'" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"'Chris Ball'" <cjb@laptop.org>
Subject: Re: 3.12: kernel panic when resuming from suspend to RAM (x86_64)
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:06:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4523614.I5MBhorHFt@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5291C948.1080305@gmail.com>
On Sunday, November 24, 2013 10:39:20 AM Francis Moreau wrote:
> Hello Thomas
>
> On 11/22/2013 11:27 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Friday, November 22, 2013 10:36:23 PM Francis Moreau wrote:
> >>> Ok, I've finally managed to find out the bad commit:
> >>> ad07277e82dedabacc52c82746633680a3187d25: ACPI / PM: Hold acpi_scan_lock
> >>> over system PM transitions
> >>>
> >>> I verified that the parent commit doesn't have the problem.
> >>
> >> Interesting.
> >>
> >>> Rafael, you're the man now ;)
> >>
> >> I kind of don't see how that commit may result in behavior that you
> >> described earlier in the thread.
> >>
> >> You get a memory corruption that seems to have started to happen because
> >> we're holding an additional lock over suspend resume now. Something's fishy
> >> on that machine and we need to figure out what it is.
> >
> > The hickup happens in the timer softirq.
> >
> > @Francis: Did you try to enable DEBUG_OBJECTS.*. If not please give it
> > a try.
>
> This looks like it was a good idea.
>
> The kernel now outputs the following traces after resuming.
>
> [ 26.973928] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4 at lib/debugobjects.c:260
> debug_print_object+0x83/0xa0()
> [ 26.973932] ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type:
> timer_list hint: delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x20
> [ 26.973972] Modules linked in: x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp
> rtsx_pci_ms coretemp memstick kvm_intel i2c_i801 iTCO_wdt
> iTCO_vendor_support i915 i2c_algo_bit intel_agp intel_gtt drm_kms_helper
> r8169 drm kvm mii agpgart i2c_core lpc_ich ac shpchp crc32c_intel
> battery thermal wmi evdev mei_me video mei button mperf processor
> serio_raw microcode ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 sr_mod cdrom sd_mod
> usb_storage rtsx_pci_sdmmc mmc_core ahci libahci libata ehci_pci
> ehci_hcd xhci_hcd scsi_mod rtsx_pci usbcore usb_common
> [ 26.974013] CPU: 0 PID: 4 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted
> 3.11.0-rc2-ARCH #64
> [ 26.974014] Hardware name: CLEVO CO. W55xEU
> /W55xEU , BIOS 4.6.5
> 03/05/2013
> [ 26.974019] Workqueue: kacpi_hotplug hotplug_event_work
> [ 26.974020] 0000000000000009 ffff880407d0da18 ffffffff81459fe9
> ffff880407d0da60
> [ 26.974023] ffff880407d0da50 ffffffff8104dc7d ffff880407fad488
> ffffffff81836fc0
> [ 26.974025] ffffffff81701358 ffffffff81afef70 0000000000000003
> ffff880407d0dab0
> [ 26.974027] Call Trace:
> [ 26.974031] [<ffffffff81459fe9>] dump_stack+0x54/0x8d
> [ 26.974043] [<ffffffff8104dc7d>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0
> [ 26.974044] [<ffffffff8104dcec>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50
> [ 26.974047] [<ffffffff81261433>] debug_print_object+0x83/0xa0
> [ 26.974050] [<ffffffff8106b820>] ? queue_work_on+0x50/0x50
> [ 26.974053] [<ffffffff81261c2b>] __debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x1fb/0x240
> [ 26.974059] [<ffffffffa008e959>] ? rtsx_pci_remove+0x119/0x1d0
> [rtsx_pci]
So a device driven by rtsx_pcr.c is removed after resume. Without the commit
you've bisected it is removed as well, but that happens during resume, so
rtsx_pci_resume() is likely not called in that case.
I bet that there's a bug either in rtsx_pci_remove() or in rtsx_pci_resume().
The latter definitely should check if the device is actually still present
before scheduling the delayed work, but then the Boris' patch should take care
of that anyway.
Thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-24 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-17 9:42 Francis Moreau
2013-11-17 13:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-17 15:50 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-17 16:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-17 18:02 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-17 19:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-17 20:49 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-17 22:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-17 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-17 22:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-18 12:21 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-18 12:20 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-18 0:33 ` Kevin Easton
2013-11-18 1:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-18 2:43 ` Kevin Easton
2013-11-18 12:19 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-18 13:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-19 10:01 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-19 10:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-20 9:45 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-20 11:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-21 8:22 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-21 10:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-21 11:17 ` Jingoo Han
2013-11-21 13:07 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-22 7:43 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-22 9:57 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-22 12:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-22 21:36 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-22 22:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-22 22:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-24 9:39 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-24 13:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-24 21:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-11-25 7:42 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-25 10:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-29 8:28 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-29 9:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-30 15:07 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-30 20:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-01 10:11 ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-01 19:26 ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-02 10:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-12-02 11:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-12-03 8:14 ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-09 19:33 ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-09 22:27 ` Samuel Ortiz
2013-12-09 22:17 ` Samuel Ortiz
2013-12-10 1:39 ` wwang
2013-12-10 1:56 ` micky
2013-12-10 8:29 ` Samuel Ortiz
2014-01-10 7:26 ` Francis Moreau
2014-01-10 9:16 ` micky
2014-01-10 9:52 ` Samuel Ortiz
2014-01-10 10:07 ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-10 10:50 ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-17 8:03 ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-18 4:05 ` micky
2013-12-18 8:12 ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-20 1:30 ` micky
2013-12-20 2:28 ` Jingoo Han
2013-12-10 10:49 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-24 9:42 ` Francis Moreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4523614.I5MBhorHFt@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=francis.moro@gmail.com \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wei_wang@realsil.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome