From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL V2] Changes for 4.8
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 20:50:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <453f38f0-be61-e0e0-b1e6-6d8d12e72076@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFz25edLv1ct--o2UuubZ3ZDvWHPdvzhjXTF1JgHdvdq3w@mail.gmail.com>
On 27/07/16 19:03, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>>
>> Support calling functions on dedicated physical cpu
>>
>> Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to
>> be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When
>> running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot
>> parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling
>> decisions.
>>
>> This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily
>> pin a (virtual) cpu to a dedicated physical cpu for executing above
>> mentioned functions on that specific cpu. The drivers (dcdbas and i8k)
>> requiring this functionality are modified accordingly.
>>
>> Unfortunately 2 of the 6 patches got no Acks as the maintainers didn't
>> react in spite of multiple pings and resends. The core modification in
>> the scheduler got an Ack from Peter and multiple tests showed no
>> regressions.
>>
>> As the series is touching multiple subsystems I couldn't find anyone
>> willing to take the series via his tree (I tried Ingo, Thomas, Peter).
>
> Thanks, this explanation was exactly what I was looking for.
>
> I'm still at two minds whether I'd prefer this kind of thing to come
> in through the x86 maintainers, or possibly the virtualization people
> who would actually use this. Or whether I'll just take it directly.
Okay.
Ingo already signaled he would be willing to take the series into one
of the -tip trees in case you don't want to take it.
I already asked David Vrabel whether he would take it via the Xen tree
and he was a little bit hesitant as some non-Xen patches got no Ack.
OTOH I'm one of the Xen maintainers, so taking the patches from me would
be fine regarding your statement you'd take the patches from "the
virtualization people". :-)
> I will take another look later when I've gotten rid of the big initial
> flood of pull requests.
Thanks,
Juergen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-27 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-27 3:59 Juergen Gross
2016-07-27 17:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-07-27 18:50 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2016-08-11 13:23 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=453f38f0-be61-e0e0-b1e6-6d8d12e72076@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®