From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758505AbWLIV6F (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 16:58:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758519AbWLIV6E (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 16:58:04 -0500 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:60572 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758505AbWLIV6C (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 16:58:02 -0500 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Message-ID: <457B315B.5030004@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:57:47 +0100 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061202 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robert P. J. Day" CC: Pekka Enberg , Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH] kcalloc: Re-order the first two out-of-order args to kcalloc(). References: <84144f020612090553n7fe309b7u54dd7f58424c4008@mail.gmail.com> <84144f020612090613s28aeb485ua7c652393cff3f90@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> On 12/9/06, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >>> once the order of the kcalloc() args is corrected, that >>> would be followed by a single subsequent patch that did the >>> kcalloc->kzalloc transformation all at once. >> ...and what would that buy us? Nothing. It *really* wants to use >> kzalloc and the transformation is equivalent, so please make it one >> patch. > > no. those two submissions represent two logically different "fixes" > and i have no intention of combining them. They are both *alloc() related cleanups without change in functionality. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-==- ==-- -=--= http://arcgraph.de/sr/