mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>
To: mdshahid03@gmail.com, anna@kernel.org
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: idmap: fix race between key revocation and payload access
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 13:58:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <457aa50d7c217019552b103912a1309f7330c617.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105173251.30389-1-mdshahid03@gmail.com>

On Thu, 2026-11-05 at 23:02 +0530, mdshahid03@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Mohammad Shahid <mdshahid03@gmail.com>
> 
> NFS idmapping retrieves the user key payload after validating the
> key, but does not hold key semaphore while accessing the
> payload.
> 
> The key revocation path acquires the key semaphore for writing
> and clears the payload pointer through user_revoke().
> 
> Without holding the semaphore ,revocation can race with payload
> access.In this case,user_key_payload_rcu can return NULL.
> 
> The existing IS_ERR_OR_NULL() check passes this NULL pointer to
> PTR_ERR(),which returns zero and incoorectly reports scuccess.
> 

Let's just fix the real problem, which is that the callers expect
nfs_idmap_get_key() to return either a non-zero length or an error
value.
Right now, it can return a zero length, which is interpreted correctly
by nfs_idmap_lookup_id(), but incorrectly by nfs_idmap_lookup_name().

The semaphore is unnecessary.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trondmy@kernel.org, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com

      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-05 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-05 17:32 mdshahid03
2026-11-05 18:58 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=457aa50d7c217019552b103912a1309f7330c617.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=trondmy@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdshahid03@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®