From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>
To: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appana.durga.rao@xilinx.com>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>,
"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"vinod.koul@intel.com" <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
"michal.simek@xilinx.com" <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@xilinx.com>,
"moritz.fischer@ettus.com" <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>,
"laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com"
<laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
"luis@debethencourt.com" <luis@debethencourt.com>
Cc: "dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dmaeninge: xilinx_dma: Fix bug in multiple frame stores scenario in vdma
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 13:34:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45807619-bf6a-0174-c102-12c03aeb575c@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C246CAC1457055469EF09E3A7AC4E11A4A65FFE9@XAP-PVEXMBX01.xlnx.xilinx.com>
Hi Kedar,
On 02-01-2017 11:46, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
> Hi Jose Miguel Abreu,
>
> Thanks for the review....
> Sorry for the delay in the reply please see comments inline...
>
>>
[snip]
>> What if we reach here and j < num_frms? It can happen because if
>> the pending list is empty the loop breaks. Then VDMA will start
>> with framebuffers having address 0x0. You should only program
>> vsize when j > num_frms or when we have already previously set
>> the framebuffers (i.e. when submitcount has already been
>> incremented num_frms at least once).
> In case of j < num_frms VDMA won't start the frame buffer having address 0
> As we are programming the VDMA buffer address based on the desc_submitcount value only i.e. i.
>
> Code snippet in the driver doing this:
> list_for_each_entry(segment, &desc->segments, node) {
> if (chan->ext_addr)
> vdma_desc_write_64(chan,
> XILINX_VDMA_REG_START_ADDRESS_64(i++),
> segment->hw.buf_addr,
> segment->hw.buf_addr_msb);
> else
> vdma_desc_write(chan,
> XILINX_VDMA_REG_START_ADDRESS(i++),
> segment->hw.buf_addr);
>
> last = segment;
> }
>
> Initially desc_submitcount will be zero.
> Let's assume h/w is configured for 10 frames and user submitted only 5 frames.
> And triggered the VDMA h/w using issue_pending in this case desc_submitcount will be 5.
> desc_submitcount will become zero again only when
> User submits more frames than h/w capable or user submit frames up to h/w capable.
>
> If my understanding is wrong could you please elaborate the race condition that you are talking above?
I just noticed there is a write to XILINX_DMA_REG_FRMSTORE which,
by the description in the VDMA databook, allows to modify the
total number of framebuffers.
Does it correct this situation: Lets assume VDMA has 10
framebuffers in HW and user only submits 5 descriptors. Then
vsize will be programmed and VDMA will start. The VDMA will start
in fb 1, then 2, ... until 5 its all ok. But then after the fb 5
the VDMA will jump to fb 6, this fb will have no address because
the user only submitted 5 addresses so VDMA will try to write to
location 0x0 of system mem (if using S2MM channel). ?
If so then there is no race condition, but the HW image that I
have does not have this register enabled so I was getting this
result (memory corruption because not all framebuffers had
addresses set).
Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu
>
> Regards,
> Kedar.
>
>> Best regards,
>> Jose Miguel Abreu
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-02 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-23 8:52 [PATCH v2 0/3] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Bug fixes Kedareswara rao Appana
2016-12-23 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Check for channel idle state before submitting dma descriptor Kedareswara rao Appana
2016-12-23 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dmaeninge: xilinx_dma: Fix bug in multiple frame stores scenario in vdma Kedareswara rao Appana
2016-12-23 15:36 ` Jose Abreu
2017-01-02 11:46 ` Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
2017-01-02 13:34 ` Jose Abreu [this message]
2017-01-02 16:00 ` Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
2017-01-03 13:51 ` Jose Abreu
2017-01-04 6:57 ` Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
2016-12-23 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Fix race condition in the driver for multiple descriptor scenario Kedareswara rao Appana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45807619-bf6a-0174-c102-12c03aeb575c@synopsys.com \
--to=jose.abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=appana.durga.rao@xilinx.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luis@debethencourt.com \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=moritz.fischer@ettus.com \
--cc=sorenb@xilinx.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®