From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2022CC433EF for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 07:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1351147AbiDOHli (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2022 03:41:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55138 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1351162AbiDOHlc (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2022 03:41:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16B4F4B1F8; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 00:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id bg9so6725703pgb.9; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 00:39:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7Z7mILpiEbIhXnxkIbIQrTgZVr/aE/tpgfsOP60J5fQ=; b=Ek/ooZ8zbGOpq4ldLwkfi6X2KgZZv1HnzYWGJx53dOVtA2RnkzoFq8zSKz79lYnl9P f3jNoGwOxUruO3I2wH4hFmEHqV5a0OnfwYJWFFN0lzo0RB7hL3WEPXMgABIx9K8k93Up Br/YK5YtXXUAaxQdLDEp7rUVapHh4pccxlM74DotEOP7p1zeCoiTCbNxB1eV8DOvUA/D C+slidK0jKPCwqw09Rn5/QoHQzWrlfQnRtQGALkEovDUZ1ZOR53/2cusntn1keEvYN6j ndzUiUWPAge7IwdrArw3d0O2aaZX3deH5MGNwfz6iz0ewBrSf+1A4NgvyjK4LEtZZGJd usEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7Z7mILpiEbIhXnxkIbIQrTgZVr/aE/tpgfsOP60J5fQ=; b=APtBI3OypXhmT3fxB//SXnrnqyJtVWAGpJvF4pV61sFIyObUKYfBU9/7Xq2hbPMrN0 GXfaja0dAVinE22jxLGifxphEdbljclvKBlhQv9gpPHB7yAvq38NDzBp28M6Ck+9+Nk0 hDOobMoU4DT9IdJveWlo5Ba9uBmiVHXLffATi998L5JxZDCng/4RRK7A0em5Q57r1tgs NMa1tnTnHcK8eRAboT+DVQ9zQ2MG35dnBFbgK9UpbXGujEhntMqH3EXUyHDhnnqdkpm3 F3NBNPhvHvTsX9CO/t+rJDLmqjdJ17/BV3nCZEfmgtKGJQksAq3uDYrxpCEAnoIa/mlc qdcA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tRCE3kMy1KXl6TMpp/ReMtHaRnyI4mK8WHNpg8lC1n7o4Ntoj DBZ0qd/6vVYalh9bAATgRfU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/mFPNudIZ2y6RfMDEwj4GDSKSQpBB7GQigl3sdT8UsSdsiuEBHlCdzEa+tF35zyGcTAiJoA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:a804:0:b0:398:e7d7:29ab with SMTP id o4-20020a63a804000000b00398e7d729abmr5294823pgf.138.1650008344416; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 00:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.80] (subs32-116-206-28-30.three.co.id. [116.206.28.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y8-20020aa78f28000000b00508225493ddsm1925680pfr.80.2022.04.15.00.39.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Apr 2022 00:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4586921d-5fc4-b63f-8264-a6fd63c592b6@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:38:58 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] net/ipv6: Introduce accept_unsolicited_na knob to implement router-side changes for RFC9131 Content-Language: en-US To: Arun Ajith S , netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, prestwoj@gmail.com, gilligan@arista.com, noureddine@arista.com, gk@arista.com References: <20220415054219.38078-1-aajith@arista.com> From: Bagas Sanjaya In-Reply-To: <20220415054219.38078-1-aajith@arista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/15/22 12:42, Arun Ajith S wrote: > +accept_unsolicited_na - BOOLEAN > + Add a new neighbour cache entry in STALE state for routers on receiving an > + unsolicited neighbour advertisement with target link-layer address option > + specified. This is as per router-side behavior documented in RFC9131. > + This has lower precedence than drop_unsolicited_na. > + > + ==== ====== ====== ============================================== > + drop accept fwding behaviour > + ---- ------ ------ ---------------------------------------------- > + 1 X X Drop NA packet and don't pass up the stack > + 0 0 X Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC > + 0 1 0 Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC > + 0 1 1 Pass NA packet up the stack, and add a STALE > + NC entry > + ==== ====== ====== ============================================== > + Hi, Building htmldocs with this patch, there are no more warnings from v4, but I don't see the table above generated in the output. I guess due to whitespace-mangling issues on your mailer, because the table syntax alignment (the =-s) don't match the contents/cells. Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara