From: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
To: "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Siddha,
Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rt14 slowdown compared to 2.6.19
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:43:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <458C97ED.4000904@cybsft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9D2C22909C6E774EBFB8B5583AE5291C0199950A@fmsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
Chen, Tim C wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> We did some benchmarking on 2.6.19-rt14, compared it with 2.6.19
> kernel and noticed several slowdowns. The test machine is a 2 socket
> woodcrest machine with your default configuration.
>
> Netperf TCP Streaming was slower by 40% ( 1 server and 1 client
> each bound to separate cpu cores on different socket, network
> loopback mode was used).
>
> Volanomark was slower by 80% (Server and Clients communicate with
> network loopback mode. Idle time goes from 1% to 60%)
>
> Re-Aim7 was slower by 40% (idle time goes from 0% to 20%)
>
> Wonder if you have any suggestions on what could cause the slowdown.
> We've tried disabling CONFIG_NO_HZ and it didn't help much.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tim
Take a look at this. Not sure if this is the same problem but it looks
like a candidate. I can definitely say that some latencies I have seen
in my recent testing have gone away in the last few versions
2.6.20-rc1-rt{3,4}.
--
kr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-23 3:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-22 21:39 Chen, Tim C
2006-12-23 0:38 ` Daniel Walker
2006-12-23 2:43 ` K.R. Foley [this message]
2006-12-23 3:00 ` K.R. Foley
2006-12-23 10:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-29 23:52 ` Chen, Tim C
2006-12-30 10:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-02 18:07 ` Chen, Tim C
2006-12-27 0:51 Chen, Tim C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=458C97ED.4000904@cybsft.com \
--to=kr@cybsft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®