From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933645AbXCEVjs (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:39:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933647AbXCEVjr (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:39:47 -0500 Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([86.65.150.130]:44334 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933645AbXCEVjq (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:39:46 -0500 Message-ID: <45EC8DF9.6060407@cosmosbay.com> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:39:05 +0100 From: Eric Dumazet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Davide Libenzi CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch - v2/resend] epoll ready set loops diet ... References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (gw1.cosmosbay.com [86.65.150.130]); Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:39:13 +0100 (CET) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Davide Libenzi a écrit : > ChangeLog: > > v2) In v1, I was trying to avoid to get the spinlock twice WRT yesterday > patch, but it turns out I can't since the ready list will be travelling > through a path w/out the ep->sem held. Oh well... > > What about the epitem->revents that we agreed to suppress ? Me confused...