From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992938AbXCIDmc (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:42:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992939AbXCIDmc (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:42:32 -0500 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:46755 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992938AbXCIDmb (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:42:31 -0500 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Message-ID: <45F0D798.4050602@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 04:42:16 +0100 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070303 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robert P. J. Day" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: any thoughts yet on a "generic" ioctl.h? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i asked about this a while back, but i still haven't heard a > definitive response as to whether it's acceptable. Maybe you get response if you post a complete patch. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== --== -=--= http://arcgraph.de/sr/