From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965678AbXCMJpA (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 05:45:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965691AbXCMJo7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 05:44:59 -0400 Received: from public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com ([195.33.99.129]:54313 "EHLO public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965678AbXCMJo6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 05:44:58 -0400 Message-Id: <45F680D9.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.1 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:45:45 +0000 From: "Jan Beulich" To: Subject: __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_TEST_AND_CLEAR_{DIRTY,YOUNG} on i386 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Isn't defining these on i386 of at most historical value. The only consumer is include/asm-generic/pgtable.h (ptep_clear_flush_{dirty,young}), and those are already suppressed by __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR_{DIRTY,YOUNG}_FLUSH being defined in include/asm-i386/pgtable.h. Or is there a particular need to detect if other uses appear (in which case the comment accompanying their definitions is pretty misleading)? Thanks, Jan