From: "Jaya Kumar" <jayakumar.lkml@gmail.com>
To: "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hugh@veritas.com>,
"Ian Campbell" <ijc@hellion.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Kel Modderman" <kel@otaku42.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at lib/radix-tree.c:473!
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 08:09:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45a44e480808170509r48060254w7d85e51e8f09ffd0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m33al7ciwr.fsf@crossbow.pond.sub.org>
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> writes:
>
>> Hugh Dickins wrote:
>>> As you can see, I'm still groping towards the right answer.
>>> The driver probably needs to provide its own backing_dev_info
>>> (or point to a suitable default), and its own address_space_ops,
>>> and perhaps more (there should be examples elsewhere). But whether
>>> it is actually wrong, or whether I was wrong to mess it up, I've
>>> not yet decided.
>>>
>>
>> My understanding is that the driver is doing something a bit clever:
>> it uses the page dirty flags to determine which parts of the
>> framebuffer have been written to, and uses that information to
>> minimize the amount of stuff that needs to be copied out. The writes
>
> Yes.
>
>> to the pages are not expected to generate actual page faults.
>>
>> But I haven't really looked at it closely, and I'm not at all familiar
>> with the vm at this layer. I'm not sure how it actually allocates the
>> framebuffer memory for example (vmalloc? incrementally on faults?).
>
> vmalloc()
>
>> I'm hoping Markus will leap in, since wrote this stuff. Or, gasp,
>> I'll read the code myself.
>
> The actual cleverness is in fb_defio[*], which was written by Jaya
> Kumar (cc'ed). I merely ripped out the old, somewhat racy cleverness
> I inherited from Anthony Liguori (which you can still admire in Xen's
> 2.6.18 kernel), and switched over to use fb_defio instead. Because
> one instance of clever code is enough.
>
> My understanding of fb_defio's inner workings is rather limited I
> fear. I'm just using it.
>
> Jaya, could you help?
>
I will try my best. Ok, I read through the thread. My current
understanding is as follows:
- Jeremy observed this issue when starting Xorg with Xen pvfb on 2.6.27-rc1
- Ian bisected it to 14fcc23fdc78e9d32372553ccf21758a9bd56fa1
- Peter pointed out from the trace we may be dirtying a page not in
the page cache
- Hugh mentioned prior to the bisected patch maybe the faulting page
had a .set_page_dirty that was ok but now it doesn't.
- Jeremy pointed out that the fault is at 1 page in to the /dev/fb0 mapping
- Hugh mentioned:
" The driver probably needs to provide its own backing_dev_info
(or point to a suitable default), and its own address_space_ops,
and perhaps more (there should be examples elsewhere). But whether
it is actually wrong, or whether I was wrong to mess it up, I've
not yet decided. "
In defio, the page mapping is provided through the vm_file that got
setup during mmap.
page->mapping = vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
I haven't figured how setting inode->i_mapping->a_ops is affecting
this. I will pull tip and test with metronomefb and see if I can
reproduce the issue when starting Xfbdev on that and start debugging
from there.
Thanks,
jaya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-17 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-14 7:02 Ian Campbell
2008-08-14 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-14 13:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-08-14 14:56 ` Ian Campbell
2008-08-14 17:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-08-14 17:38 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-14 19:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-14 21:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-08-14 22:04 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-14 22:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2008-08-17 12:09 ` Jaya Kumar [this message]
2008-08-17 14:00 ` zhang wenjie
2008-08-14 23:13 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-08-15 0:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-08-17 16:19 ` Ian Campbell
2008-08-18 1:32 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-18 7:54 ` Ian Campbell
2008-08-18 8:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-18 8:05 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-18 8:22 ` Jaya Kumar
2008-08-17 3:37 zhang wenjie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45a44e480808170509r48060254w7d85e51e8f09ffd0@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jayakumar.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=kel@otaku42.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®