From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Ashwin Gundarapu <linuxuser509@zohomail.in>,
"anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com" <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
andrewnetdev <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, davem <davem@davemloft.net>,
edumazet <edumazet@google.com>, kuba <kuba@kernel.org>,
pabeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: e100: replace silent 'hope for the best' with debug message
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 14:28:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45efcb6b-a439-4b38-8214-1c2f4f6808e9@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19e49280392.4757403170773.5767589851918809405@zohomail.in>
Hi,
On 5/21/26 08:10, Ashwin Gundarapu wrote:
> From: Ashwin Gundarapu <linuxuser509@zohomail.in>
> Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 15:09:12 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] net: e100: replace silent 'hope for the best' with debug
> message
>
> Replace a silent return with a debug message when no MII PHY is
> detected on known variants. This gives users visibility into the
> failure instead of silently hoping for the best.
It's not silent actually, e100_phy_check_without_mii() already prints a
message when returning 1.
Not sure this patch achieves anything meaningful...
Maxime
>
> Found by checkpatch.pl inspection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashwin Gundarapu <linuxuser509@zohomail.in>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
> index 9074b558de35..bfacf877ca40 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
> @@ -1450,7 +1450,9 @@ static int e100_phy_init(struct nic *nic)
> * But do this AFTER MII checking only, since this does
> * lookup of EEPROM values which may easily be unreliable. */
> if (e100_phy_check_without_mii(nic))
> - return 0; /* simply return and hope for the best */
> + netif_dbg(nic, probe, nic->netdev,
> + "No MII PHY detected, continuing anyway\n");
> + return 0;
> else {
> /* for unknown cases log a fatal error */
> netif_err(nic, hw, nic->netdev,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 6:10 Ashwin Gundarapu
2026-05-21 12:07 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-21 12:24 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-05-21 12:28 ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
2026-05-21 13:16 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-22 7:09 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-22 7:48 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-05-22 21:52 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45efcb6b-a439-4b38-8214-1c2f4f6808e9@bootlin.com \
--to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxuser509@zohomail.in \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®