From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] topology: Fix cpumask_of_node macro for CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES=n
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 11:07:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45fda375-3691-e722-000f-188dd13d2e0b@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200526174443.207610-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
On 5/26/20 10:44 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The following compile error is seen in linux-next if
> NUMA=n and CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES=n.
>
> CC drivers/hwmon/amd_energy.o
> In file included from ../arch/x86/include/asm/cpumask.h:5:0,
> from ../arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:11,
> from ../arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:22,
> from ../arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:16,
> from ../drivers/hwmon/amd_energy.c:6:
> ../drivers/hwmon/amd_energy.c: In function 'amd_energy_read':
> ../include/asm-generic/topology.h:51:36: error:
> void value not ignored as it ought to be
> #define cpumask_of_node(node) ((void)node, cpu_online_mask)
> ../include/linux/cpumask.h:618:72: note:
> in definition of macro 'cpumask_first_and'
> #define cpumask_first_and(src1p, src2p) cpumask_next_and(-1, (src1p), (src2p))
> ^~~~~
> ../drivers/hwmon/amd_energy.c:194:6: note: in expansion of macro 'cpumask_of_node'
>
> cpumask_of_node() is missing () around the 'node' parameter.
>
> Fixes: b339752d054f ("cpumask: fix spurious cpumask_of_node() on non-NUMA multi-node configs")
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
Thanks.
> ---
> include/asm-generic/topology.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/topology.h b/include/asm-generic/topology.h
> index 238873739550..5aa8705df87e 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/topology.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/topology.h
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> #define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == 0 ? cpu_online_mask : cpu_none_mask)
> #else
> - #define cpumask_of_node(node) ((void)node, cpu_online_mask)
> + #define cpumask_of_node(node) ((void)(node), cpu_online_mask)
> #endif
> #endif
> #ifndef pcibus_to_node
>
--
~Randy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-26 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-26 17:44 Guenter Roeck
2020-05-26 18:07 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45fda375-3691-e722-000f-188dd13d2e0b@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®