From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753376AbXDKQyH (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:54:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753377AbXDKQyH (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:54:07 -0400 Received: from hp3.statik.TU-Cottbus.De ([141.43.120.68]:43886 "EHLO hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753376AbXDKQyG (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:54:06 -0400 Message-ID: <461D1291.2060703@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:53:37 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070222 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Engelhardt CC: Al Boldi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/30] Use menuconfig objects References: <200704110112.39425.a1426z@gawab.com> <200704110742.38727.a1426z@gawab.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Apr 11 2007 07:42, Al Boldi wrote: >>Also, I don't think it's necessary to touch any of the "depends on"; keep >>them as is, as they don't hurt staying that way, and may actually be >>necessary under certain circumstances. (see EMBEDDED) > > Simplifying the depends lines is a good thing IMO. If explicit dependency statements are replaced by if--endif blocks, does this count as simplification? -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=-- -=-== http://arcgraph.de/sr/