From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752568AbXDUACN (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:02:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752812AbXDUACN (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:02:13 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:33576 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752568AbXDUACL (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:02:11 -0400 Message-ID: <4629547D.9090404@goop.org> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:02:05 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Jones , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , pavel@suse.cz, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "Eric W. Biederman" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , gregkh@suse.de Subject: Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions References: <20070416003723.GM3691@stusta.de> <4628482B.6040804@goop.org> <20070420050344.GG20566@redhat.com> <46284C84.6060301@goop.org> <20070420051908.GH20566@redhat.com> <462850B3.70901@goop.org> <20070420145126.GC25051@redhat.com> <4628DC0A.60707@goop.org> <20070420160308.GB20118@redhat.com> <4628F586.3040606@goop.org> <20070420172147.GC20118@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20070420172147.GC20118@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > Dave Jones wrote: > > > > Andi, I think. I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this kernel. > > > > > > Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related. > > > > > > > Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled, and it still works. > > > > Maybe there's something in Andi's queue which is making it work? > > Shrug, I'm out of ideas. I'm hoping that it'll magically start working > when people start flushing their git trees for .22 > Maybe that'll yield a clue for something that can be backported to .21.x > because right now, I'm completely puzzled. Well, it seemed reliable, but I just got a resume failure. Different from any previous symptom I've seen: Intel machine check architecture supported Intel machine check reporting enabled enabled on CPU#1 Back to C! J