From: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] CPU enable method based SMP/hotplug + MSM conversion
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:04:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <463D867F-6EF1-40E4-8AFB-28E54433CD79@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CE005A.3070802@codeaurora.org>
On Jan 8, 2014, at 7:50 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 01/08/14 13:37, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 December 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> This is a rework of patches sent a months back by Rohit[1].
>>> The goal of these patches is to add support for SMP and (basic)
>>> hotplug on MSM based SoCs. To get there, we add support for a
>>> generic way to hook in SMP/hotplug support code based on DT. To
>>> show how it's used, we convert the MSM8660 SMP support code over
>>> to the new method. After that we add support for the rest of the
>>> upstream MSM SoCs (note these patches are piled high on top of
>>> Rohit's patches to add 8074 support to MSM[2] and my follow ups[3,4],
>>> but this should only matter to the MSM maintainers).
>>>
>>> This is one of the last items of code that still requires us to have
>>> a mach directory and a machine descriptor. We should be able to move
>>> the hotplug/smp code out of mach directories if this approach is
>>> accepted.
>> The implementation looks ok to me, but I wonder whether on a global
>> scale we want to tie it more closely to the cpuidle implementations.
>> We already have a drivers/cpuidle framework, and while I admit
>> that I'm not familiar with the code in there, I would assume that
>> the smp operations and the cpuidle code usually go hand in hand.
>
> Sure. Right now the smp ops code is fairly well tied into the arch layer
> so it sounds like there is some future work when we move this stuff out
> of the mach directory.
>
> Would arm-soc be able to pick these patches up for 3.14? I think
> everything is in place for these patches now that Mark has reviewed them.
Ping, wondering if arm-soc would pick up:
ARM: Introduce CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE() for cpu hotplug/smp
The other patches are all msm specific so we can handle them through the normal channels.
- k
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-23 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-24 0:39 Stephen Boyd
2013-12-24 0:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] devicetree: bindings: Document Krait/Scorpion cpus and enable-method Stephen Boyd
2014-01-08 14:21 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-08 23:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-24 0:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] devicetree: bindings: Document qcom,kpss-acc Stephen Boyd
2014-01-08 14:25 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-08 14:32 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-08 23:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-24 0:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] devicetree: bindings: Document qcom,saw2 node Stephen Boyd
2014-01-08 14:36 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-08 15:21 ` Mark Rutland
2013-12-24 0:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] ARM: Introduce CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE() for cpu hotplug/smp Stephen Boyd
2014-01-08 15:06 ` Mark Rutland
2013-12-24 0:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] ARM: msm: Remove pen_release usage Stephen Boyd
2013-12-24 0:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] ARM: msm: Re-organize platsmp to make it extensible Stephen Boyd
2013-12-24 0:39 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] ARM: msm: Add SMP support for KPSSv1 Stephen Boyd
2013-12-24 0:39 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] ARM: msm: Add SMP support for KPSSv2 Stephen Boyd
2013-12-24 0:39 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] ARM: dts: msm: Add nodes necessary for SMP boot Stephen Boyd
2014-01-06 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] CPU enable method based SMP/hotplug + MSM conversion Stephen Boyd
2014-01-08 15:20 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-08 21:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-09 1:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-01-23 22:04 ` Kumar Gala [this message]
2014-02-07 21:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/9] ARM: msm: Remove board-dt.c Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=463D867F-6EF1-40E4-8AFB-28E54433CD79@codeaurora.org \
--to=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rvaswani@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome