From: Michael Wang <yun.wang@profitbricks.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] raid1: reset 'bi_next' before reuse the bio
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:40:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <465f2653-3afc-3329-dbf4-af13010113b7@profitbricks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87shlnizqn.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
On 04/05/2017 12:17 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
[snip]
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
>> index 7d67235..0554110 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
>> @@ -1986,11 +1986,13 @@ static int fix_sync_read_error(struct r1bio *r1_bio)
>> /* Don't try recovering from here - just fail it
>> * ... unless it is the last working device of course */
>> md_error(mddev, rdev);
>> - if (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
>> + if (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)) {
>> /* Don't try to read from here, but make sure
>> * put_buf does it's thing
>> */
>> bio->bi_end_io = end_sync_write;
>> + bio->bi_next = NULL;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> while(sectors) {
>
>
> Ah - I see what is happening now. I was looking at the vanilla 4.4
> code, which doesn't have the failfast changes.
My bad to forgot mention... yes our md stuff is very much close to the
upstream.
>
> I don't think your patch is correct though. We really shouldn't be
> re-using that bio, and setting bi_next to NULL just hides the bug. It
> doesn't fix it.
> As the rdev is now Faulty, it doesn't make sense for
> sync_request_write() to submit a write request to it.
Make sense, while still have concerns regarding the design:
* in this case since the read_disk already abandoned, is it fine to
keep r1_bio->read_disk recording the faulty device index?
* we assign the 'end_sync_write' to the original read bio in this
case, but when is this supposed to be called?
>
> Can you confirm that this works please.
Yes, it works.
Tested-by: Michael Wang <yun.wang@profitbricks.com>
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> index d2d8b8a5bd56..219f1e1f1d1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> @@ -2180,6 +2180,8 @@ static void sync_request_write(struct mddev *mddev, struct r1bio *r1_bio)
> (i == r1_bio->read_disk ||
> !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery))))
> continue;
> + if (test_bit(Faulty, &conf->mirrors[i].rdev->flags))
> + continue;
>
> bio_set_op_attrs(wbio, REQ_OP_WRITE, 0);
> if (test_bit(FailFast, &conf->mirrors[i].rdev->flags))
>
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-05 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-04 13:50 Michael Wang
2017-04-04 22:17 ` NeilBrown
2017-04-05 7:40 ` Michael Wang [this message]
2017-04-06 2:03 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=465f2653-3afc-3329-dbf4-af13010113b7@profitbricks.com \
--to=yun.wang@profitbricks.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®