mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hendrik ." <chasake@yahoo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reading a bad sector does not report failure as 'read error' but hangs PC with 'Machine Check Exception'
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:45:09 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4677.91718.qm@web52001.mail.re2.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070729213051.20ebc51e@the-village.bc.nu>

>> hangs. If I try it after a reboot with 'mcelog --k8
>> --ascii' or whatever parameter, there is no output
at
> You could type error back in from the email ?

Ok I copied it into the tool, it gives me:

CPU 0 4 northbridge TSC b7d4a144d0 
  Northbridge ECC error
  ECC syndrome = 0
STATUS 0 MCGSTATUS 4

This is a bit strange because I repeatedly tested the
RAM yesterday and it gives no problems. And even more
interesting: the error occurs at a reproducible
moment: when reading the bad sector from the Seagate
harddisk. And with an older kernel I was able to just
copy all stuff from the drive using dd_rescue... I do
not have ECC RAM in my PC by the way.

> > Isn't it strange to say that the controller does
> > something bad if there is just a bad sector on the
> > drive that is reported and handled correctly in an
> > older kernel 
> Not really. Its very strange it gives an MCE at all
> but this is a known
> failure path (and should be a fixed known failure
> path) for the Nvidia SATA.

So how to proceed in tackling this problem now? Is
there anything I can do to (help you guys ;)) fix it?
At this moment it unfortunately does not look to me as
a fixed failure path...


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-29 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.0jeOedb9xyA9k8S1VmCEkqHxsyw@ifi.uio.no>
2007-07-29 15:33 ` Robert Hancock
2007-07-29 16:43   ` Hendrik .
2007-07-29 20:30     ` Alan Cox
2007-07-29 21:45       ` Hendrik . [this message]
2007-07-29 22:14       ` Hendrik .
2007-07-29 18:39   ` Hendrik .
     [not found] <fa.tKSW2T164UTRMvntkUO/fGg0UlM@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.iA7ClD7fNtxdfJ9YhG0lqougi/0@ifi.uio.no>
2007-08-01  9:42   ` Robert Hancock
2007-07-30 20:30 Hendrik .
2007-08-01 18:28 ` Phillip Susi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-29 15:04 Hendrik .

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4677.91718.qm@web52001.mail.re2.yahoo.com \
    --to=chasake@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome