mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: core: Rearrange variable declarations involving __free()
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2025 16:56:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4691667.LvFx2qVVIh@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Follow cleanup.h recommendations and always define and assign variables
in one statement when __free() is used.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   27 +++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1845,7 +1845,6 @@ static unsigned int cpufreq_verify_curre
  */
 unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = NULL;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
@@ -1860,7 +1859,7 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get(unsigned
 
 	read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
 
-	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 	if (policy)
 		return policy->cur;
 
@@ -1876,9 +1875,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_quick_get);
  */
 unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get_max(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
-
-	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 	if (policy)
 		return policy->max;
 
@@ -1894,9 +1891,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_quick_get_max);
  */
 __weak unsigned int cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
-
-	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 	if (policy)
 		return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
 
@@ -1920,9 +1915,7 @@ static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct
  */
 unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
-
-	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 	if (!policy)
 		return 0;
 
@@ -2751,9 +2744,7 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_refresh(struc
  */
 void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
-
-	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 	if (!policy)
 		return;
 
@@ -2770,9 +2761,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy);
  */
 void cpufreq_update_limits(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
-
-	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 	if (!policy)
 		return;
 
@@ -3054,9 +3043,7 @@ static int __init cpufreq_core_init(void
 
 static bool cpufreq_policy_is_good_for_eas(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
-
-	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 	if (!policy) {
 		pr_debug("cpufreq policy not set for CPU: %d\n", cpu);
 		return false;




             reply	other threads:[~2025-09-03 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-03 14:56 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-09-03 15:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-04  4:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-09-04 10:47   ` Zihuan Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4691667.LvFx2qVVIh@rafael.j.wysocki \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®