From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764775AbXGLM04 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:26:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757740AbXGLM0r (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:26:47 -0400 Received: from mcclure-nat.wal.novell.com ([130.57.22.22]:35552 "EHLO mcclure.wal.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757399AbXGLM0q convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:26:46 -0400 Message-Id: <4695E5BB0200005A0002763E@mcclure.wal.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.2 HP Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:26:35 -0400 From: "Gregory Haskins" To: Cc: , , , , , , "David Bahi" , "Moiz Kohari" , "Sven Dietrich" , , , , , Subject: Re: Forward port of latest RT patch (2.6.21.5-rt20) to 2.6.22 available Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 14:07 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Gregory Haskins wrote: > > > Hi Ingo, Thomas, and the greater linux-rt community, > > > > I just wanted to let you guys know that our team has a port of > > the 21.5-rt20 patch for the 2.6.22 kernel available. [...] > > great! We had the upstream -rt port to .22 in the works too, it was just > held up by the hpet breakage - which Thomas managed to fix earlier > today. I've released the 2.6.22.1-rt1 patch to the usual place: > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/ Thats awesome, Ingo! Thanks! Could you publish a broken out version as well? We found it extremely valuable to be able to bisect this beast while working on the 21-22 port. > > I took a quick look at the delta between .22.1-rt1 and your rt1 merge, > and the delta patch is quite large and i saw no obvious fixes to pick > up. Could you please filter out any fixes that you might have in your > tree that you think should be applied, and send it to us as a delta > against .22.1-rt1? Will do > (And, as Daniel suggested, in the future, could you _please_ use a > different naming scheme instead of using up the upstream -rt namespace.) Yeah, sorry about that. -Greg