From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759823AbXGPJFY (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:05:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753774AbXGPJFO (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:05:14 -0400 Received: from fep01.mfe.bur.connect.com.au ([203.63.86.21]:51019 "EHLO fep01.mfe.bur.connect.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753825AbXGPJFN (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:05:13 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 531 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:05:12 EDT Message-ID: <469B31E8.6050906@murdoch.edu.au> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:52:56 +0800 From: "Z. Cliffe Schreuders" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Including STRTOK_R in a LSM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am aware strtok was removed from the kernel in 2002. However strtok_r is more desirable than strsep as I do not want to know about 'blank fields' (2 consecutive delimiters). Is it acceptable to simply include the strtok_r code in my security module? or should I create a wrapper for strsep to ignore blanks? Thanks, Z. Cliffe Schreuders Please cc me.