From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: does CONFIG_UNUSED_SYMBOLS have any value anymore?
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:26:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <469F749F.8030606@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707190849450.30763@localhost.localdomain>
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
...
> it's not clear if that means that it was a *one-time* transition
> aid which is now unnecessary, or whether it's an *ongoing* aid which
> might be used at any time. currently, there are no invocations of
> EXPORT_UNUSED_SYMBOL[_GPL] anywhere in the tree. so does that mean
> this feature can be tossed? or might it still be used every so often?
git-blame (or qgit, which I actually used) points from this part of
lib/Kconfig.debug to the following chunk in
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt:
What: Unused EXPORT_SYMBOL/EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL exports
(temporary transition config option provided until then)
The transition config option will also be removed at the same time.
When: before 2.6.19
Why: Unused symbols are both increasing the size of the kernel binary
and are often a sign of "wrong API"
Who: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=== =--==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-19 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-19 12:53 Robert P. J. Day
2007-07-19 14:26 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2007-07-19 14:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-07-19 15:34 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-07-19 15:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-07-19 16:22 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-07-19 15:32 ` Robert P. J. Day
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=469F749F.8030606@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®