From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934639AbXGUGMo (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:12:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754385AbXGUGMh (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:12:37 -0400 Received: from proxima.lp0.eu ([85.158.45.36]:49860 "EHLO proxima.lp0.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752908AbXGUGMg (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:12:36 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=exim; d=fire.lp0.eu; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:OpenPGP:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DLAN9fEWQCH2PyFzvMobqB4fpc/aEcn5zmndBgmWK+1q7t0yKlTAJ4RsSWnRS1rd1WO0exfLdBbjS9hhuIVGuBPxNqQlC5ImUk6WBYX6l3mp2OqBJB5f+TdzWv83EFOc; Message-ID: <46A1A3D0.4010704@simon.arlott.org.uk> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 07:12:32 +0100 From: Simon Arlott User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Wilcox CC: Denis Cheng , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] run scripts/Lindent on it to match Documentation/CodingStyle References: <1184489571313-git-send-email-crquan@gmail.com> <4699EEA9.6070709@simon.arlott.org.uk> <20070720170743.GF14791@parisc-linux.org> <46A0F282.8070103@simon.arlott.org.uk> <20070720180019.GJ14791@parisc-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20070720180019.GJ14791@parisc-linux.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: id=89C93563 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20/07/07 19:00, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 06:36:02PM +0100, Simon Arlott wrote: >> Mass >> replacing any labels run through Lindent with space prefixes would seem >> like a bad idea :/ > > We don't tend to mass-run code through Lindent. This may or may not be > a bad thing, but the fact is that it just doesn't happen. I realise that, and it would be a big mess to do so - but when code is run through it, it shouldn't modify existing good code into slightly worse code. -- Simon Arlott