From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>,
jidong xiao <jidong.xiao@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: what does select statement mean in Kconfig file?
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:00:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A28217.2060005@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3lkd95tzf.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> writes:
>
>> The latter is sometimes hard or impossible to satisfy. Therefore the
>> select statement should be used with care, i.e. only for library-type
>> helper code which itself shouldn't depend on further options.
>
> How about depending on common dependency?
>
> Something like
>
> config A
> bool XXX
> depends on ARM
>
> config B
> depends on ARM
> select A
>
>
> or:
>
> if ARM
> config A
> bool XXX
> endif
>
> if ARM
> config B
> select A
> endif
That's OK. Or generally, if A depends on X and B wants to select A,
then it has to be guaranteed by whatever means that X is enabled,
because "make XYZconfig" cannot select recursively. Duplicating A's
dependencies as dependencies for B is one way to ensure that A's
dependencies are satisfied when B selects A. Another way is to select
not only A but also A's dependencies.
That's why I wrote "/shouldn't/ depend on further options" rather than
"/must not/ depend on further options".
But whatever you do, as soon as you add a "select A", you have to watch
if anybody eventually makes A dependent on something else. Therefore
think twice before you use select.
Also, while select makes it easy for users to enable options, it makes
it somewhat difficult for users to /disable/ options. So there are also
tradeoffs in usability. This essentially means that you should never
select huge subsystems. As I said, only library-like helpers are
suitable for select.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=== =-=-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-21 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-21 13:34 jidong xiao
2007-07-21 13:38 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-07-21 16:51 ` Stefan Richter
2007-07-21 21:26 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-07-21 22:00 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46A28217.2060005@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=jidong.xiao@gmail.com \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®