From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934828AbXGXJHJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:07:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761783AbXGXJG4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:06:56 -0400 Received: from hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de ([141.43.120.68]:41917 "EHLO hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760092AbXGXJGz (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:06:55 -0400 Message-ID: <46A5C105.20707@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:06:13 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070509 SeaMonkey/1.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yinghai Lu CC: Andrew Morton , ak@suse.de, clameter@sgi.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, greg@kroah.com, hch@infradead.org, rientjes@google.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/10] try parent numa_node at first before using default v2 References: <200707231323.57502.yinghai.lu@sun.com> In-Reply-To: <200707231323.57502.yinghai.lu@sun.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/23/2007 10:23 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > this one already in -mm, but it needs [PATCH 1/10] > > [PATCH 3/10] try parent numa_node at first before using default v2 [...] > this patch is using second method. [...] Could you shorten the patch description? Don't describe what your patch _does not_ do. Don't even describe _how_ your patch does what it does (unless it's obfuscated, but then that would be a bad patch anyway). Just describe _why_ it does something. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=== ==--- http://arcgraph.de/sr/