From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933224AbXGYQ2S (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:28:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754937AbXGYQ2K (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:28:10 -0400 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:55557 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754783AbXGYQ2J (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:28:09 -0400 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Message-ID: <46A779E1.603@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:27:13 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070609 SeaMonkey/1.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manuel Lauss CC: Andreas Micklei , Andreas Messer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [BUG] firewire: mass-storage i/o-problems References: <200707222332.12270.andreas.messer@stud-mail.uni-wuerzburg.de> <46A3E973.6090701@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20070723063741.GA32240@roarinelk.homelinux.net> <46A45B65.9000704@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20070723084505.GB349@roarinelk.homelinux.net> <46A49244.9010402@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20070723183336.GA3736@roarinelk.homelinux.net> <20070723184405.GB3736@roarinelk.homelinux.net> <46A6598B.5080004@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20070725051208.GA13710@roarinelk.homelinux.net> In-Reply-To: <20070725051208.GA13710@roarinelk.homelinux.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Manuel Lauss wrote: > I tried 2.6.23 in the meantime, it's *MUCH* harder to trigger; in fact > I had to skip through movies for ~10 minutes to get the orb timeout. > The disk was inaccessible for a few seconds then recovered fine. > >> Could you (and everyone else who has repeated I/O errors with the new >> drivers, but not with the old drivers) test the attached patches, one >> patch at a time? They apply to 2.6.22. > > Will do. There are a few firewire fixes in 2.6.23-rc1 relative to 2.6.22, but I don't believe they've got something to do with this issue. Hence it would be practical to test the patches on 2.6.22, but if you prefer you could also test them on 2.6.23-*. Thanks, -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=== ==--= http://arcgraph.de/sr/