Hello Andrew, thanks for your reply! Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 19:03:12 +0300 Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: > >> was my report so complicated? > > We're bad. > > Seems that your context switch rate when running two instances of > badblocks against two different disks went batshit insane. It doesn't > happen here. > > Please capture the `vmstat 1' output while running the problematic > workload. > > The oom-killing could have been unrelated to the CPU load problem. iirc > badblocks uses a lot of memory, so it might have been genuine. Keep an eye > on the /proc/meminfo output and send the kernel dmesg output from the > oom-killing event. Please see the attached files. Unfortunately I don't see any useful info in them: *_before: before running any badblocks process *_while: while running badblocks process, but without any cron job having kicked in *_bad: 5 minutes later that some cron jobs kicked in About the OOM killer, indeed I believe that it is unrelated. It started killing after about 2 days, that hundreds of processes were stuck as running and taking up memory, so I suppose the 256 MB RAM were truly filled. I just mentioned it because its behaviour is completely non-helpful. It doesn't touch the badblocks process, it rarely touches the stuck as running cron jobs, but it kills other irrelevant processes. If you still want the killing logs, tell me and I'll search for them. Thanks, Dimitris