Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 14:05, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 13:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 11:58, Damien Wyart wrote:
>>>>>>> No, I do not have CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP set,
>>>>>>> because I do not have CONFIG_PM_SLEEP set,
>>>>>>> because I do not want SUSPEND and/or HIBERNATION.
>>>>>> Same answer from my side: I do not have CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP for the same
>>>>>> reason (and this worked fine without them in rc7). I do not think
>>>>>> these settings should have changed between rc7 and rc8.
>>>> Well, we haven't changed much.
>>>>
>>>>> Also, another test I just did: on another computer, rc8 is fine
>>>>> regarding ACPI power off, even if CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is not set. I can
>>>>> provide config if needed.
>>>> On the box that fails to power off, can you please test -rc8 with these two
>>>> commits reverted:
>>>>
>>>> commit 5a50fe709d527f31169263e36601dd83446d5744
>>>> ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling of Sx states addendum
>>>>
>>>> commit f216cc3748a3a22c2b99390fddcdafa0583791a2
>>>> ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling of Sx states.
>>>>
>>>> and see if it works?
>>> If it does, please test the patch from this message
>>>
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119052978117735&w=4
>>>
>>> on top of vanilla 2.6.23-rc8.
>> You will need one more patch on top of just mentioned one.
> 
> Hm, why did you put acpi_target_sleep_state under CONFIG_SUSPEND?
> 
> CONFIG_HIBERNATION needs acpi_target_sleep_state  too.
Agree, attaching updated patch.

Thanks,
Alex.