From: yangjiale133 <yangjiale133@163.com>
To: "Eugenio Perez Martin" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"virtualization@lists.linux.dev" <virtualization@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] VIRTIO: Update the desc 'flag' fied last in packed ring.
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 09:58:56 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46a9dc36.1986.19e8b34896c.Coremail.yangjiale133@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJaqyWfugEttrQuR5_LrbQaivAqCaixsprUOjEVtdiz_sexFpA@mail.gmail.com>
From the device's perspective, during a single read of the descriptor
list-and that list spans across cache lines.
the retrieved data will show `desc[head].flags` as valid,
and `desc[i].flags` as valid as well; however,
the `desc[i].addr` and `len` fields may be invalid.
I suspect this occurs because a single DMA operation is internally
split into multiple parallel read transactions,
aligned to cache line boundaries.
I apologize that I currently lack the necessary environment to verify
whether this modification definitively resolves the issue or
merely reduces the probability of its occurrence;
therefore, this patch can be discarded.
yangjiale
At 2026-06-02 14:04:13, "Eugenio Perez Martin" <eperezma@redhat.com> wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 6:34 AM yangjiale <yangjiale133@163.com> wrote:
>>
>> When a descriptor list spans across cache lines,
>> updating the flag first can lead to a scenario where the device side
>> perceives the flag as valid, yet the corresponding address and length
>> fields remain unupdated—resulting in invalid values.
>> Therefore, the flag field must be updated last.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: yangjiale <yangjiale133@163.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>> index fbca7ce1c6bf..036b4f90d30f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>> @@ -1688,6 +1688,10 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
>> &addr, &len, premapped, attr))
>> goto unmap_release;
>>
>> + desc[i].addr = cpu_to_le64(addr);
>> + desc[i].len = cpu_to_le32(len);
>> + desc[i].id = cpu_to_le16(id);
>> +
>> flags = cpu_to_le16(vq->packed.avail_used_flags |
>> (++c == total_sg ? 0 : VRING_DESC_F_NEXT) |
>> (n < out_sgs ? 0 : VRING_DESC_F_WRITE));
>> @@ -1696,10 +1700,6 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
>> else
>> desc[i].flags = flags;
>>
>> - desc[i].addr = cpu_to_le64(addr);
>> - desc[i].len = cpu_to_le32(len);
>> - desc[i].id = cpu_to_le16(id);
>> -
>> if (unlikely(vq->use_map_api)) {
>> vq->packed.desc_extra[curr].addr = premapped ?
>> DMA_MAPPING_ERROR : addr;
>
>These flags are updated before the flags of the head descriptor at the
>end of the function, at "vq->packed.vring.desc[head].flags =
>head_flags", so the device should not see these. Because of that, the
>relative order between the rest of the fields of the same descriptor
>or other descriptors' fields, except for the head descriptor's flags,
>should not matter. There is a write memory barrier just before
>updating the head's flags.
>
>Also, I don't get why the cache line matters here. Can you expand? Am
>I missing something?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 4:31 yangjiale
2026-06-02 6:04 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2026-06-02 6:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-02 9:21 ` Dongli Zhang
2026-06-03 1:58 ` yangjiale133 [this message]
2026-06-03 2:08 ` Xuan Zhuo
[not found] ` <5a3e06d5.103d.19e8b1863dd.Coremail.yangjiale133@163.com>
2026-06-03 5:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-05 16:03 ` Si-Wei Liu
2026-06-05 17:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-05 18:50 ` Si-Wei Liu
2026-06-06 0:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-08 8:08 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2026-06-02 6:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-03 1:09 ` Xuan Zhuo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46a9dc36.1986.19e8b34896c.Coremail.yangjiale133@163.com \
--to=yangjiale133@163.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®