mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] xen: optimize xenbus driver for multiple concurrent xenstore accesses
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:59:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46b54be4-297a-af8f-aac2-f2a080752034@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170123100918.13523-4-jgross@suse.com>

On 01/23/2017 05:09 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Handling of multiple concurrent Xenstore accesses through xenbus driver
> either from the kernel or user land is rather lame today: xenbus is
> capable to have one access active only at one point of time.
>
> Rewrite xenbus to handle multiple requests concurrently by making use
> of the request id of the Xenstore protocol. This requires to:
>
> - Instead of blocking inside xb_read() when trying to read data from
>   the xenstore ring buffer do so only in the main loop of
>   xenbus_thread().
>
> - Instead of doing writes to the xenstore ring buffer in the context of
>   the caller just queue the request and do the write in the dedicated
>   xenbus thread.
>
> - Instead of just forwarding the request id specified by the caller of
>   xenbus to xenstore use a xenbus internal unique request id. This will
>   allow multiple outstanding requests.
>
> - Modify the locking scheme in order to allow multiple requests being
>   active in parallel.
>
> - Instead of waiting for the reply of a user's xenstore request after
>   writing the request to the xenstore ring buffer return directly to
>   the caller and do the waiting in the read path.
>
> Additionally signal handling was optimized by avoiding waking up the
> xenbus thread or sending an event to Xenstore in case the addressed
> entity is known to be running already.
>
> As a result communication with Xenstore is sped up by a factor of up
> to 5: depending on the request type (read or write) and the amount of
> data transferred the gain was at least 20% (small reads) and went up to
> a factor of 5 for large writes.
>
> In the end some more rough edges of xenbus have been smoothed:
>
> - Handling of memory shortage when reading from xenstore ring buffer in
>   the xenbus driver was not optimal: it was busy looping and issuing a
>   warning in each loop.
>
> - In case of xenstore not running in dom0 but in a stubdom we end up
>   with two xenbus threads running as the initialization of xenbus in
>   dom0 expecting a local xenstored will be redone later when connecting
>   to the xenstore domain. Up to now this was no problem as locking
>   would prevent the two xenbus threads interfering with each other, but
>   this was just a waste of kernel resources.
>
> - An out of memory situation while writing to or reading from the
>   xenstore ring buffer no longer will lead to a possible loss of
>   synchronization with xenstore.
>
> - The user read and write part are now interruptible by signals.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>

Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-23 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-23 10:09 [PATCH v3 0/3] xen: optimize xenbus performance Juergen Gross
2017-01-23 10:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] xen: clean up xenbus internal headers Juergen Gross
2017-01-23 10:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] xen: modify xenstore watch event interface Juergen Gross
2017-01-23 10:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] xen: optimize xenbus driver for multiple concurrent xenstore accesses Juergen Gross
2017-01-23 18:59   ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2017-01-24 13:47     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-24 16:23       ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-24 17:17         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-02-07 17:51         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-02-07 22:39           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-02-08  6:21             ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46b54be4-297a-af8f-aac2-f2a080752034@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®