mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: eperezma@redhat.com, gal@nvidia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] vdpa: introduce .reset_map operation callback
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:05:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46bd545d-6a90-fb51-3beb-dc942f9609af@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEscjR_bTVfwaRcQ8qxpiOEJAT35Y1uoj=kBptYkbijDbw@mail.gmail.com>



On 8/15/2023 6:55 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 3:49 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/14/2023 7:21 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 9:46 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    include/linux/vdpa.h | 7 +++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/vdpa.h b/include/linux/vdpa.h
>>>> index db1b0ea..3a3878d 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/vdpa.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/vdpa.h
>>>> @@ -314,6 +314,12 @@ struct vdpa_map_file {
>>>>     *                             @iova: iova to be unmapped
>>>>     *                             @size: size of the area
>>>>     *                             Returns integer: success (0) or error (< 0)
>>>> + * @reset_map:                 Reset device memory mapping (optional)
>>>> + *                             Needed for device that using device
>>>> + *                             specific DMA translation (on-chip IOMMU)
>>> This exposes the device internal to the upper layer which is not optimal.
>> Not sure what does it mean by "device internal", but this op callback
>> just follows existing convention to describe what vdpa parent this API
>> targets.
> I meant the bus tries to hide the differences among vendors. So it
> needs to hide on-chip IOMMU stuff to the upper layer.
>
> We can expose two dimensional IO mappings models but it looks like
> over engineering for this issue. More below.
>
>>    * @set_map:                    Set device memory mapping (optional)
>>    *                              Needed for device that using device
>>    *                              specific DMA translation (on-chip IOMMU)
>> :
>> :
>>    * @dma_map:                    Map an area of PA to IOVA (optional)
>>    *                              Needed for device that using device
>>    *                              specific DMA translation (on-chip IOMMU)
>>    *                              and preferring incremental map.
>> :
>> :
>>    * @dma_unmap:                  Unmap an area of IOVA (optional but
>>    *                              must be implemented with dma_map)
>>    *                              Needed for device that using device
>>    *                              specific DMA translation (on-chip IOMMU)
>>    *                              and preferring incremental unmap.
>>
>>
>>> Btw, what's the difference between this and a simple
>>>
>>> set_map(NULL)?
>> I don't think parent drivers support this today - they can accept
>> non-NULL iotlb containing empty map entry, but not a NULL iotlb. The
>> behavior is undefined or it even causes panic when a NULL iotlb is
>> passed in.
> We can do this simple change if it can work.
If we go with setting up 1:1 DMA mapping at virtio-vdpa .probe() and 
tearing it down at .release(), perhaps set_map(NULL) is not sufficient.
>
>>   Further this doesn't work with .dma_map parent drivers.
> Probably, but I'd remove dma_map as it doesn't have any real users
> except for the simulator.
OK, at a point there was suggestion to get this incremental API extended 
to support batching to be in par with or even replace .set_map, not sure 
if it's too soon to conclude. But I'm okay with the removal if need be.
>
>> The reason why a new op is needed or better is because it allows
>> userspace to tell apart different reset behavior from the older kernel
>> (via the F_IOTLB_PERSIST feature bit in patch 4), while this behavior
>> could vary between parent drivers.
> I'm ok with a new feature flag, but we need to first seek a way to
> reuse the existing API.
A feature flag is needed anyway. I'm fine with reusing but guess I'd 
want to converge on the direction first.

Thanks,
-Siwei
>
> Thanks
>
>> Regards,
>> -Siwei
>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>> + *                             @vdev: vdpa device
>>>> + *                             @asid: address space identifier
>>>> + *                             Returns integer: success (0) or error (< 0)
>>>>     * @get_vq_dma_dev:            Get the dma device for a specific
>>>>     *                             virtqueue (optional)
>>>>     *                             @vdev: vdpa device
>>>> @@ -390,6 +396,7 @@ struct vdpa_config_ops {
>>>>                          u64 iova, u64 size, u64 pa, u32 perm, void *opaque);
>>>>           int (*dma_unmap)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned int asid,
>>>>                            u64 iova, u64 size);
>>>> +       int (*reset_map)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned int asid);
>>>>           int (*set_group_asid)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned int group,
>>>>                                 unsigned int asid);
>>>>           struct device *(*get_vq_dma_dev)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx);
>>>> --
>>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-17  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-02 17:12 [PATCH 0/2] vdpa/mlx5: Fixes for ASID handling Dragos Tatulea
2023-08-02 17:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] vdpa/mlx5: Fix mr->initialized semantics Dragos Tatulea
2023-08-03  8:03   ` Jason Wang
2023-08-03 11:40     ` Dragos Tatulea
2023-08-08  2:57       ` Jason Wang
2023-08-08  7:24         ` Dragos Tatulea
2023-08-09  1:42           ` Jason Wang
2023-08-14 14:15             ` Dragos Tatulea
2023-08-15  1:28               ` Jason Wang
2023-08-03 17:57     ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-08  3:00       ` Jason Wang
2023-08-08 22:58         ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-09  6:52           ` Jason Wang
2023-08-10  0:40             ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-10  3:10               ` Jason Wang
2023-08-10 22:20                 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-14  2:59                   ` Jason Wang
2023-08-15  1:43                     ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] vdpa: decouple reset of iotlb mapping from device reset Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-15  1:43                       ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] vdpa: introduce .reset_map operation callback Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-15  2:21                         ` Jason Wang
2023-08-15 19:49                           ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-16  1:55                             ` Jason Wang
2023-08-17  0:05                               ` Si-Wei Liu [this message]
2023-08-17 15:28                                 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-08-21 22:31                                   ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-15  1:43                       ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] vdpa/mlx5: implement .reset_map driver op Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-15  8:26                         ` Dragos Tatulea
2023-08-15 23:11                           ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-15  1:43                       ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] vhost-vdpa: should restore 1:1 dma mapping before detaching driver Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-15  2:32                         ` Jason Wang
2023-08-15 23:09                           ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-15  1:43                       ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] vhost-vdpa: introduce IOTLB_PERSIST backend feature bit Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-15  2:25                         ` Jason Wang
2023-08-15 22:30                           ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-16  1:48                             ` Jason Wang
2023-08-16 23:43                               ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-22  8:54                                 ` Jason Wang
2023-08-28 23:46                                   ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-08-02 17:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] vdpa/mlx5: Delete control vq iotlb in destroy_mr only when necessary Dragos Tatulea
2023-08-10  8:54 ` [PATCH 0/2] vdpa/mlx5: Fixes for ASID handling Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-08-10  8:59   ` Jason Wang
2023-08-10  9:04   ` Dragos Tatulea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46bd545d-6a90-fb51-3beb-dc942f9609af@oracle.com \
    --to=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=gal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®