From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
mike.leach@linaro.org, swboyd@chromium.org
Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] coresight: etm4x: Fix etm4_count race by moving cpuhp callbacks to init
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 23:56:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46cc76c0-3ed7-9877-6cec-0f9ad6226cef@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200729051310.18436-1-saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
On 07/29/2020 06:13 AM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> etm4_count keeps track of number of ETMv4 registered and on some systems,
> a race is observed on etm4_count variable which can lead to multiple calls
> to cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_cpuslocked(). This function internally calls
> cpuhp_store_callbacks() which prevents multiple registrations of callbacks
> for a given state and due to this race, it returns -EBUSY leading to ETM
> probe failures like below.
>
> coresight-etm4x: probe of 7040000.etm failed with error -16
>
> This race can easily be triggered with async probe by setting probe type
> as PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS and with ETM power management property
> "arm,coresight-loses-context-with-cpu".
>
> Prevent this race by moving cpuhp callbacks to etm driver init since the
> cpuhp callbacks doesn't have to depend on the etm4_count and can be once
> setup during driver init. Similarly we move cpu_pm notifier registration
> to driver init and completely remove etm4_count usage. Also now we can
> use non cpuslocked version of cpuhp callbacks with this movement.
>
> Fixes: 9b6a3f3633a5 ("coresight: etmv4: Fix CPU power management setup in probe() function")
> Fixes: 58eb457be028 ("hwtracing/coresight-etm4x: Convert to hotplug state machine")
> Suggested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-03 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-29 5:13 Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-08-03 20:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-08-03 22:56 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2020-08-07 3:52 ` Tingwei Zhang
2020-08-07 3:58 ` tingwei
2020-08-10 17:42 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46cc76c0-3ed7-9877-6cec-0f9ad6226cef@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®