Hi Dan,

On 5/19/22 08:43, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 01:12:01AM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c
>> index a2691c7f96f6..7105122c2ba0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c
>> @@ -47,9 +47,18 @@ ReadEFuseByte(
>>  
>>  	/* Check bit 32 read-ready */
>>  	retry = 0;
>> -	value32 = rtw_read32(Adapter, EFUSE_CTRL);
>> -	while (!(((value32 >> 24) & 0xff) & 0x80)  && (retry < 10000)) {
>> -		value32 = rtw_read32(Adapter, EFUSE_CTRL);
>> +	res = rtw_read32(Adapter, EFUSE_CTRL, &value32);
>> +	if (res)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	while (retry < 10000) {
>> +		res = rtw_read32(Adapter, EFUSE_CTRL, &value32);
>> +		if (res)
>> +			continue;
> 
> Forever loop.  Always put the ++ in side the while ().  Apparently,
> Smatch does not catch this.  #Idea #Oppurtunity
> 

I have missed it every single loop... :(

That's why I don't like 'while' loops, 'for' suits much better for this 
kind of things.


Thanks you for your review! Will address your comments in next version




With regards,
Pavel Skripkin