From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752006AbeCWPEf (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:04:35 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:47122 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751686AbeCWPEX (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:04:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Fix the decoding of segment overrides in 64bit mode To: Wanpeng Li , Andrew Cooper Cc: LKML , kvm , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= References: <1521707651-9375-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> <49454fe4-16e2-4d8b-7ad5-9e488afc786e@citrix.com> <9bd82cb0-d88f-4891-a111-3704802e1d4e@redhat.com> <94bbfac5-2022-ab92-0b9a-1c3cd2275054@citrix.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <46ef9359-a87c-224c-53e0-c948b79314a8@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:04:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/03/2018 15:27, Wanpeng Li wrote: > 2018-03-22 21:53 GMT+08:00 Andrew Cooper : >> On 22/03/18 13:39, Wanpeng Li wrote: >>> 2018-03-22 20:38 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini : >>>> On 22/03/2018 12:04, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>>>> We've got a Force Emulation Prefix (ud2a; .ascii "xen") for doing >>>>> magic. Originally, this was used for PV guests to explicitly request an >>>>> emulated CPUID, but I extended it to HVM guests for "emulate the next >>>>> instruction", after we had some guest user => guest kernel privilege >>>>> escalations because of incorrect emulation. >>>> Wanpeng, why don't you add it behind a new kvm module parameter? :) >>> Great point! I will have a try. Thanks Paolo and Andrew. :) >> >> Using the force emulation prefix requires intercepting #UD, which is in >> general a BadThing(tm) for security. Therefore, we have a build time > > Yeah, however kvm intercepts and emulates #UD by default, should we > add a new kvm module parameter to enable it and disable by default? No, the module parameter should only be about the force-emulation prefix. Paolo