From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Cc: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Move the user namespace under the option
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:54:45 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4700A7C5.5080005@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709270837220.5275@localhost.localdomain>
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/user_namespace.h b/include/linux/user_namespace.h
>>> index b5f41d4..dda160c 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/user_namespace.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/user_namespace.h
>>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ struct user_namespace {
>>>
>>> extern struct user_namespace init_user_ns;
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_USER_NS
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NAMESPACES_EXPERIMENTAL
>
> is it really a good precedent to introduce Kconfig variables that
> literally include the word "EXPERIMENTAL"?
How else can we call it? I proposed one config option for
each namespace with "depends on EXPERIMENTAL" dependency,
but everyone else said that two options are much better.
> rday
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-01 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-26 15:39 [PATCH 0/5] A config option to compile out some namespaces code Pavel Emelyanov
2007-09-26 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] The config option itself Pavel Emelyanov
2007-09-26 16:30 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-26 16:34 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-09-26 17:06 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-09-27 2:30 ` sukadev
2007-09-27 8:22 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-01 14:27 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-10-01 14:28 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2007-09-27 12:28 ` Cedric Le Goater
2007-09-26 15:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] Move the UST namespace under the option Pavel Emelyanov
2007-09-27 12:29 ` Cedric Le Goater
2007-09-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] Move the IPC " Pavel Emelyanov
2007-09-27 12:38 ` Cedric Le Goater
2007-10-01 7:52 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2007-09-26 15:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] Move the user " Pavel Emelyanov
2007-09-27 12:31 ` Cedric Le Goater
2007-09-27 12:38 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-10-01 7:54 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2007-10-01 8:42 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-10-01 14:14 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-09-26 15:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] Move the PID " Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-01 15:31 [PATCH 0/5] A config option to compile out some namespaces code (v2) Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-01 15:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] Move the user namespace under the option Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-31 10:58 [PATCH 0/5] A config option to compile out some namespaces code (v3) Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-31 11:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] Move the user namespace under the option Pavel Emelyanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4700A7C5.5080005@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clg@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome