From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1EF08462 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 20:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770668606; cv=none; b=QT6/Am2FMMTRxsF/K1xT5gYfVe4TeXPTtLwByWhF6273FDnXj8GI/AfckRqT0nhHdCYX6KdaCXc9vxJuod8LJLWtmB2cdsi3c7oaY7DVtlAcH4qFYi72S45LvYtZlqgoostqNwB7RdlpKTE3VTofJ5TkiLRYX8n9+GTLpcTzEjc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770668606; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nnbREnjeAlS9R7fwFT5IjYHQk1/0Ltbvgu0fSd5Haz0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=c33165ecdm/nnvqFjE58yFJGgSpWGXjoX/l1zsjz9YfhlGbBRgEbcPNUMxMmtckgzrrYILCIgPm1UPTcreMg/sX8kheAgULER7Qinm+9s6SfUTLo1evmIJ9iEXXywBSjKPqt7Y28zWXj947FRc+AkIE687Z5d7fsba5tUs9Oe4o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b=sQWKgWON; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b="sQWKgWON" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To; bh=nt4Ovoy4m7nRv3iWqhMS4n2L4nM1SijSDjnOMZdvRUQ=; b=sQWKgWONrIw6wBZy5vUXrZeycP r1qROwKD65KWKsC1hiniLLent/znjlT0A9GSiY+d41OLTXDbmwvr7UGcXRM+rVL4h9Yc4WAF30kv1 AxJYqPOLrZiGa2gzbIO/veNNXomxl+KaMH9haSs2qLnOa9KQG8kjthtAlzbXkiWeP2s5T4OLYwjA+ kF7Eyrh/4wlEBl4FZ6ZYVnbcH8A0ehvY9o75GolQ1sxJyLd71E7J5mYJY8yc2Z1rjJvtQbvaBMYMh wBLeC+YZz/JQR0OIo1bjDdwNodv7ubdsGY2jI3H9Pdp5Q90TG0lvDQWdYnLaIhvxdjZQKILGtASe9 LL/9+9Uw==; Received: from i53875a32.versanet.de ([83.135.90.50] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vpXmn-007q7p-PF; Mon, 09 Feb 2026 21:23:10 +0100 From: Heiko =?UTF-8?B?U3TDvGJuZXI=?= To: Jonas Karlman Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kever.yang@rock-chips.com" , "finley.xiao@rock-chips.com" , "w@1wt.eu" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable OTP controller for RK3562 Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2026 21:23:09 +0100 Message-ID: <4721118.KgjxqYA5nG@diego> In-Reply-To: References: <20260205212347.490636-1-heiko@sntech.de> <20260205212347.490636-2-heiko@sntech.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am Montag, 9. Februar 2026, 17:54:51 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Normalzeit schr= ieb Jonas Karlman: > Hi Heiko, >=20 > Thanks for including my RK3528 patches :-) >=20 > On 2/5/2026 10:23 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > Enable the One Time Programmable Controller (OTPC) in RK3562 and add > > an initial nvmem fixed layout. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > >=20 > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot= /dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi > > index f84676b47b27..07626dba21bf 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi > > @@ -1093,6 +1093,52 @@ sdmmc1: mmc@ff890000 { > > status =3D "disabled"; > > }; > > =20 > > + otp: otp@ff930000 { >=20 > I noticed that the node names is not consistent for all three patches in > this series. >=20 > A quick grep at Linux src also suggest that efuse@ being the most common > node name used for similar otpc/efuse, efuse is also listed under > 2.2.2 Generic Names Recommendation in DT spec. >=20 > Maybe the nodes should be renamed to use efuse@ or something else? =46ine by me :-) So we'll make this efuse@ for all 3 newly added otp controllers. Heiko