mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] fbdev: Restart conflicting fb removal loop when unregistering devices
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 13:57:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4727ce99-7107-d806-cbea-cd45c6ce6106@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2156c28c-9c9c-555e-ce19-933cdc8d5e74@suse.de>

Hello Thomas,

On 5/11/22 13:47, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi Javier
> 
> Am 11.05.22 um 13:30 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
>> Drivers that want to remove registered conflicting framebuffers prior to
>> register their own framebuffer, calls remove_conflicting_framebuffers().
>>
>> This function takes the registration_lock mutex, to prevent a races when
>> drivers register framebuffer devices. But if a conflicting framebuffer
>> device is found, the underlaying platform device is unregistered and this
>> will lead to the platform driver .remove callback to be called, which in
>> turn will call to the unregister_framebuffer() that takes the same lock.
>>
>> To prevent this, a struct fb_info.forced_out field was used as indication
>> to unregister_framebuffer() whether the mutex has to be grabbed or not.
>>
>> A cleaner solution is to drop the lock before platform_device_unregister()
>> so unregister_framebuffer() can take it when called from the fbdev driver,
>> and just grab the lock again after the device has been registered and do
>> a removal loop restart.
>>
>> Since the framebuffer devices will already be removed, the loop would just
>> finish when no more conflicting framebuffers are found.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> 
> I'd like to shrink this patchset. This looks like it can be merged 

Same. At least this version dropped a few patches that we had in v4
(related to DRM_FIRMWARE capability flag).

> immediately?
>

Yes, this one is independent of the others and could be merged already.

> Best regards
> Thomas
> 

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-11 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-11 11:24 [PATCH v5 0/7] Fix some races between sysfb device registration and drivers probe Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] firmware: sysfb: Make sysfb_create_simplefb() return a pdev pointer Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:04   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] firmware: sysfb: Add helpers to unregister a pdev and disable registration Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:54   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 12:01     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:05       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 12:29         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:02   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 12:24     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:30 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] fbdev: Restart conflicting fb removal loop when unregistering devices Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:47   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 11:57     ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2022-05-13 12:28   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] fbdev: Make sysfb to unregister its own registered devices Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-06-07 15:01   ` Daniel Vetter
2022-06-07 15:41     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] Revert "fbdev: Prevent probing generic drivers if a FB is already registered" Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:32 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] fbdev: Make registered_fb[] private to fbmem.c Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 17:00   ` Sam Ravnborg
2022-05-11 17:17     ` Guenter Roeck
2022-05-11 17:34       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-12 18:32         ` Sam Ravnborg
2022-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] Fix some races between sysfb device registration and drivers probe Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-13 11:10   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-13 11:32     ` Thomas Zimmermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4727ce99-7107-d806-cbea-cd45c6ce6106@redhat.com \
    --to=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®