From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754499AbbIRQbM (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:31:12 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:57068 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754394AbbIRQbI (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:31:08 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,553,1437462000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="647627154" From: "Rustad, Mark D" To: Jiri Slaby CC: Shuah Khan , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux@roeck-us.net" , "shuah.kh@samsung.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/33] 3.12.48-stable review Thread-Topic: [PATCH 3.12 00/33] 3.12.48-stable review Thread-Index: AQHQ79GFE6I48sjje0+Dd/s2u4sW8p5CaPsAgACLiAA= Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:31:02 +0000 Message-ID: <47371482-CF1B-4CCF-B99E-AD077AD814EF@intel.com> References: <55F84359.3090101@osg.samsung.com> <55FBC738.9090403@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <55FBC738.9090403@suse.cz> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [134.134.176.78] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_623FBB5D-83CE-4C2B-8E6F-564056CAE4F1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Apple-Mail=_623FBB5D-83CE-4C2B-8E6F-564056CAE4F1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On Sep 18, 2015, at 1:11 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >=20 > On 09/15/2015, 06:12 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> Jiri, >>=20 >> I am seeing problems during PCI scans with this patch. I had >> to boot it in recovery mode once and it is booting fine after >> that, however, this is a concern >>=20 >> Could these be the reason? >>=20 >> Mark Rustad (2): >> PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through function 0 >> PCI: Add VPD function 0 quirk for Intel Ethernet devices >=20 > Ok, so I released 3.12.48 without these two, but left them in the = queue > for the next release as they don't look as they caused the issue. If = you > can confirm whether they introduce the problem or not, it would be = great. I haven't been able to see a way for the patches to be involved, but I = have no objection to deferring these. My only concern is what the cause = actually was. -- Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation --Apple-Mail=_623FBB5D-83CE-4C2B-8E6F-564056CAE4F1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV/DxEAAoJEDwO/+eO4+5u7cIQAJr9uot7jZ4+brcV/AatnqV6 E84NqJDxwjC3WIB1VjJdCWWBhgnIaF63GDf8V89EOME+vY+xmygDiZz8UMKUoYGB kEM0cfBMy5bPoz6q7umZKhz4p/b8y17+YJA54/08fNL5bI/7fm2ahFGnJ6VziO12 l+GdjmiJ4sDW1A1Czz5iBszhIuOkJ4Lc1xGGoNQaW0ILcONVdnWU0M37+EPBsBBa XY6MPI6o/c3MVMPkJLk/ll3bIwqKR0CTU0/NpO6HIHTNUqEFLtZZgQMTX0f9jIVK TpcFYnKRd4FashYFSDysvYxVpxZYNlZRNhh+FgsWgTovRcC3qWRfhErnN0cs/yHI etti985MjPuifJiS2bMX+P0RwH9UPWDy1x4LE+eZW5IMOPNmjQCMLMj025qwYREB w/1FV4FVPXbH+arMo52y9ZhIU29yjEMAtcZx/Wx1u/n608GyOPetsM5bsLR+Pcw0 dA9cveYQy72dK7hV1p9cNhZMb6YICL+q5Wt9xaUXMnfaEhyvizKvgiJHGstVovah YjruQj5CQ5WC4KSNRyVePLFyEYkZXWBieJPNU/JiR/qZXO7AgKipy0rfhubCQjHg +negL1krxeWS7nVdlOnmoP61DLcktKladvqDf5vl/eiDwckGVMo2MZCIJcER+V2J FRzST2YOvfr4FHFz2btl =PYGZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_623FBB5D-83CE-4C2B-8E6F-564056CAE4F1--