mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vishal Patil" <vishpat@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 15:30:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4745278c0606091230g1cff8514vc6ad154acb62e341@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello

I ran the sysbench benchmark to compare the CSCAN I/O scheduler
against the CFQ scheduler and following are the results. The results
are interesting especially in case of sequential writes and the random
workloads

                                            Latency (seconds)

               seq            seq         seq             rnd
 rnd         rnd
               reads         writes      r + w          reads
writes      r + w
               --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CFQ         0.0116      0.0164      0.0107      0.1178       0.0423      0.0605

CSCAN    0.0148      0.0092      0.0169      0.1043      0.0473      0.0732


                                           Throughput (MB/seconds)

                seq            seq         seq             rnd
  rnd         rnd
                reads         writes      r + w          reads
writes      r + w

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CFQ        19.062      15.251      22.127      2.1197      1.0032       1.376

CSCAN   14.553      22.108      14.72       2.394       0.9304         1.399


The machine configuation is as follows
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
Memory: 1027500 KB (1 GB)
Filesystem: ext3
Kernel:   2.6.16.2

If interseted you may have a look at the raw data at
http://www.google.com/notebook/public/14554179817860061151/BDQtXSwoQ2_mdxLgh

- Vishal

             reply	other threads:[~2006-06-09 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-09 19:30 Vishal Patil [this message]
2006-06-10  2:15 ` Vishal Patil
2006-06-11 10:09   ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-06-11 18:58   ` Jens Axboe
2006-06-11 23:47     ` Vishal Patil
2006-06-12  6:41       ` Jens Axboe
2006-06-12 17:38         ` Vishal Patil
2006-06-12 22:21           ` Nate Diller
2006-06-13  5:46           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4745278c0606091230g1cff8514vc6ad154acb62e341@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vishpat@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®