From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: "Luca" <luca.b633@gmail.com>, "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia@gmail.com>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, <binutils@sourceware.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] 32-bit pointers in x86-64
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:31:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47567DF8.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de8d50360711251045l4566f894m92fbb32d00fa362@mail.gmail.com>
>>> "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia@gmail.com> 25.11.07 19:45 >>>
>On 11/25/07, Luca <luca.b633@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 7.1. Add __attribute__((pointer_size(XXX))) and #pragma pointer_size
>> to allow 64-bit pointers in 32-bit mode and viceversa
>
>This is already there, try using __attribute__((mode(DI) )).
Hmm, unless this is a new feature in 4.3, I can't seem to get this to work on
either i386 (using mode DI) or x86-64 (using mode SI). Could you clarify? If
this worked consistently on at least all 64-bit architectures, I would have a
use for it in the kernel (cutting down the kernel size by perhaps several
pages). Btw., I continue to think that the error message 'initializer element
is not computable at load time' on 64-bit code like this
extern char array[];
unsigned int p = (unsigned long)array;
or 32-bit code like this
extern char array[];
unsigned long long p = (unsigned long)array;
is incorrect - the compiler generally has no knowledge what 'array' is (it may
know whether the architecture is generally capable of expressing the
necessary relocation, but if 'array' is really a placeholder for an assembly
level constant, possibly even defined through __asm__() in the same
translation unit, this diagnostic should at best be a warning). I'm pretty
sure I have an open bug for this, but the sad thing is that bugs like this
never appear to really get looked at.
Thanks, Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-05 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-25 16:29 Luca
2007-11-25 18:45 ` Andrew Pinski
2007-12-05 9:31 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2007-12-05 10:48 ` Andrew Pinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47567DF8.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.b633@gmail.com \
--cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®