From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net (003.mia.mailroute.net [199.89.3.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 302B82EE607; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 15:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755012341; cv=none; b=FQryj7rLksBHiqD/W/7CvS7MkZy7TbtDyoGtV0ikLR70neERQADqeCaIw41FAXs2CsXUlfG5zMAEUijSwAF+LcOwn28mr10qhX4700ofFXIaAypAYrLWJPIUT0GvMTjWdQT0h/r57lrRt27x7ecC9H1sjbohhoTr3i5kXxx2wOo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755012341; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nsseHiGWk7TU6ziuiwgkyJRZliJgc8C0Kg70M7ASIV0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=tE/Tv+WQ+b4BHtEG4Yqus6YfJb/Y+t6nXnnwrKWZ3kQ23xNyDi5A3y8Weuvofjd9C9IjVokvsCz28opxdHCOo6I8H2zAzhzx6+8BZGgnPbPHTA6TyPAMysQZaWDXvi8tp96BDZKG7qj6dzofrvGudndB4Vm/757WXnBZmc9Cg34= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=xH+xHPkg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="xH+xHPkg" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4c1b162NrYzlgqVc; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 15:25:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1755012329; x=1757604330; bh=3tLxKxc+TwcFKq6KBdf5w9PF lXQRscOu7o1mOOsV3xg=; b=xH+xHPkgFiba63Cb2RNsicnQw25Veqp+0LUTO1pZ A3+fgxMHu8VBX7q0J3rNEWvoz82EtRkLSIdYV5Ett4+1S3kE8sID3SVKUp5JAFms zTNb/fKwOPB2+i+2zCu3xkHThjyxtyyrGpDvULnFtfPBggHlEc2sZrOPtsoo5jXH AoNkIVqTfU7m5v5D64LyQOoKNFffdX7tezMZeV6/mUaH9EPUXhzXGIaLavJFJHCa gDSfyLhAeeb0bKUWWWkjEdc+kxdRdo3UaH+OcJ7b/obfGqPXVaeyi3HgvrxP3C6+ Jr3kMuyXic624+9jM1b1dNDEnG4mPC63KwKrGbMnPzMebg== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (003.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id 53PdLyMLiwHx; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 15:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.66.154.22] (unknown [104.135.204.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4c1b123NtbzlgqVs; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 15:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <475fb909-cbd2-4de0-8044-8fc5b0a1b400@acm.org> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:25:24 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix "prefered"->"preferred" To: Xichao Zhao , axboe@kernel.dk Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250812091803.94751-1-zhao.xichao@vivo.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20250812091803.94751-1-zhao.xichao@vivo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/12/25 2:18 AM, Xichao Zhao wrote: > Trivial fix to spelling mistake in comment text. > > Signed-off-by: Xichao Zhao > --- > block/blk-mq.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c > index 9692fa4c3ef2..adb26eab67d8 100644 > --- a/block/blk-mq.c > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c > @@ -2361,7 +2361,7 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async) > EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_run_hw_queue); > > /* > - * Return prefered queue to dispatch from (if any) for non-mq aware IO > + * Return preferred queue to dispatch from (if any) for non-mq aware IO > * scheduler. > */ > static struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *blk_mq_get_sq_hctx(struct request_queue *q) This patch conflicts with one of my patch series so it would help me if this patch would not be applied. I can integrate this patch in my patch that modifies the behavior of this function. See also https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20250811200851.626402-5-bvanassche@acm.org/T/#u Bart.