mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Indan Zupancic" <indan@nul.nu>
To: "Tejun Heo" <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul Mundt" <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, garyhade@us.ibm.com
Subject: sd_resume redundant?  [was: [PATCH] libata: implement  ata_wait_after_reset()]
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 00:33:17 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4764.81.207.0.53.1179613997.squirrel@secure.samage.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464F4A58.2050607@gmail.com>

On Sat, May 19, 2007 21:04, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Yeah, if SCR registers are accessible, 0xff doesn't indicate the device
>> isn't there, so the whole skip-0xff logic probably shouldn't apply in
>> such cases, but we can also achieve pretty good result by just making
>> the first reset tries a bit more aggressive.
>
> So, here's the patch.
>
> Paul, can you please test this patch without the previous patch?  Indan,
> this should reduce the resume delay.  Please test.  But you'll still
> feel some added delay compared to 2.6.20 due to the mentioned
> suspend/resume change.

This removed the COMRESET errors indeed, and with sd_resume()
disabled everything is speedy again (2s or so. Still a desktop pc).
I didn't try with sd_resume enabled.

Everything seems to work fine without sd_resume(), so why is it needed?

Greetings,

Indan



  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-19 22:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-10  7:20 libata reset-seq merge broke sata_sil on sh Paul Mundt
2007-05-10 11:28 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-10 11:53   ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-10 12:46     ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-10 13:08       ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-11  0:52         ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-11  9:39           ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-12  3:49             ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-16  0:30               ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-16 16:44                 ` [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset() Tejun Heo
2007-05-17  0:50                   ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-17  0:59                     ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-19 15:54                   ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 18:23                     ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 22:54                       ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20  9:50                         ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 13:26                           ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20 17:09                             ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 19:35                               ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 16:39                   ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 18:43                     ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 19:04                       ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 22:33                         ` Indan Zupancic [this message]
2007-05-20  9:54                           ` sd_resume redundant? [was: [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset()] Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 14:27                             ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20 17:17                               ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 19:47                                 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-21  6:02                         ` [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset() Paul Mundt
2007-05-29  1:31                   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-29  7:33                     ` Tejun Heo
     [not found] <fa.M0o+I253i7tt/LF97sml0AM+Gec@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.j/gDhS9FZwWkX/stLhREkTHNbFs@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <fa.EalQUMJMBHX/KTGV2QFQLG6tYus@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]     ` <fa.Zh3ttZJ9A5tObhEjMLSALUpxCuQ@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]       ` <fa.tQ9LHpM0TOYAYEug36HHMvEVOO0@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]         ` <fa.jSmqI/kJPff3zaVtC404yNL5/Qk@ifi.uio.no>
2007-05-20 17:45           ` sd_resume redundant? [was: [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset()] Robert Hancock
2007-05-20 18:53             ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-20 22:25               ` Robert Hancock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4764.81.207.0.53.1179613997.squirrel@secure.samage.net \
    --to=indan@nul.nu \
    --cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®